If science is a self-correcting process...?

Question

and is the search for the truth in nature. How can a book, written by humans, at a time when knowledge of the natural world was extremely limited, be considered truth?

Answer 1

Thus science, reason, and logic are all superior to superstitious belief.

Answer 2

Not just truth, But the Whole Complete Absolute TRUTH whish you will burn in Everlasting Hellfire And Damnation If You Do Not Believe It TRUTH. The kind of truth they are willing to kill you over. They must be fought before they turn the world into a fudamentalist Christian Taliban State, like Ohio.

Answer 3

CORRECTING TODAY:: IS THE>> LIE<<:: IS SELF CORRECTING

YOU PUT THIS IN THE RELIGIOUS SECTION SO I HAD TO ADD CLARIFICATION THAT U SAID WAS A SCIENCE QUESTION NOT A RELIGIOUS QUESTION

I'M SAYING THEY HAVE CREATED A VERTICAL ECONOMY AND CAN'T SUSTAIN IT AND ALL THING ARE A LIE NOW CAUSE WE CAN'T GET BACK TO WHERE WE WERE AND OSOMA KNOW THIS AS WILL AND WE ALL ENTREPRENEURIAL EXPLORERS OF THINGS GONE BAD, KNOW WHAT WE KNOW~IF I CAN'T LEAD AT LEAST I WILL TEACH AND IN THIS THEY WILL KNOW WHY THEY DIE, AND FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLL

Answer 4

If science is self correcting, it means it got it wrong. Why should we allow people to disseminate WRONG information. Why should we pay them for WRONG information.

Would you pay for the WRONG thing at a store.

If you got the WRONG thing, would you take it back and ask for a refund.

Maybe SCIENCE owes us some refunds

Answer 5

Presumably you are speaking of the bible, and so shall I. The book should not be judged on its date, or on its authors; it should be judged on its consistency and correspondence with facts, and it is here that it fails spectacularly. See references for details.