They say, I don't know how this started, maybe I can find out. They try to figure it out using reason based on evidence not that kind of assumption on a higher power. The problem is that we are so late and such a small part of the universe that evidence can be too ancient or completely none existant on our one little tiny rock we call home. So we accept this and still search but accept that we may never understand completely due to the limitations of our mind, until a genious of great proportions comes along (Einstein, Newton) and makes things a little clearer. We know we may never find that answer but we always get a little closer, like a logarithm, always getting closer but never reaching the end.
So does either side think I'm full of crap? Can we atleast agree on this? And does this completely disprove that atheists aren't arrogant like so many theists claim but possibly even more humble as atheism is pretty much the admition that we don't have all the answers?
2006-08-08
09:35:08
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous