What is the real reason why there is a difference between an Atheist and a Theist, nature or nuture?

Answer 1

both, but let me explain why.

nature comes into play when a person is young. their nature to question, and for these questions to be rather uncomfortable to the person who's supposed to be answering them. a need to have an explanation for everything that satisfies them.

nurture for this person to be given the "correct" wrong answers. if my priest gave me normal answers to my questions, logical answers, i may still have been catholic. but no, i was berated, told "girls like you go to hell", and generally felt like the church had abandoned me. the bible wasn't giving me the answers i needed. i was told that we had to take everything literally, and i noticed that this idea doesn't make any sense. this was where i began to wonder whether god existed in the first place.

so yes, i think it's both.

Answer 2

Interesting question. I would say definitely both nature AND nurture. Some people have genetic traits which cause them to be more open-minded, question authority, logical, and not gullible. Those are my traits. Obviously, I could be completely wrong. God could certainly exist after all. But I am also a product of my environment. Though I would be classified as very politically conservative, I did not grow up having religion thrown in my face all the time, being forced to believe, and have everything be about religion. Some people have and were nurtured to be religious.

If God really does exist, which noone really does know the answer to at this time, then you have to wonder why it is that he did not instill his belief in everyone's NATURE. Yes, he gave free will, but you think he would want his Creations to be made at a higher standard where they don't malfunction and betray Him. Certainly, if God exists all of us atheists are betraying Him. Although I think He will probably forgive and maybe not send us to the same "layer" of Hell that Hitler went to, we can only believe what our NATURE and our environment (nurture) leads us to. Now, conversely, if God does NOT exist, theists spent some time believing in a myth, something false, in a brainwashed sort of way. Pascal would tell us that scenario is a much better wager to make, however. But nevertheless, beliefs are definitely a product of nature and nurture, for sure. And everyone should use their free will and believe whatever they makes them happy, motivated, and emotionally comfortable, as long as it is not hurting another human being.

Answer 3

There is a difference only in perception. Nature nurtures even when disasters occur. A disaster is only that because someone percieved it as a disaster... and Theists percieve the occurences in their lives differently than Atheists do, sometimes for the better, sometimes for worse... so if I had to choose between your two options, it is the difference in perception of where they get their nurturing from. It has little to do with a person's nature. Although a person's nature may well be a determining factor on how easily they would believe said religiousity.
Blessed Be.

Answer 4

I don't know that there is a real difference between the way we look at nature, or even some respect of science.

As a believer I understand that the Creator had to used the laws of science to create. I look at nature and I see design. I see purpose in nature. Is that unreasonable?

Many things I will agree with Atheist on, the only difference is the question of faith. I believe, but you don't have to. My choice is mine, your choice is yours.

I believe that the reason that Atheist don't believe is because of people who do believe. Lets be honest, look at the way most people who claim to be Christians act. Are they believable? Many times they are not. Fact! But for me I can not base my beliefs on the way that someone else is acting. I have to take the time and learn what my faith teaches and try to live it. Okay I fall short, but it doesn't mean I give up. I keep trying.

What make faith believable is when people who claim it actually live it. That is what makes it believable. So how can anyone believe is all they see is those that claim it but don't live it. Sad. But that is just the way it has become.

I won't push my beliefs on you but if I live them and you ask, then I will tell you.

Answer 5

Nuture by far. Do you honestly beleive that anyone born into a non-religious society would come up with the stories present in the Bible? Hell no. That proves it is completely a nuture principal, and not a natural one.

Answer 6

Atheists and theists come in a variety of styles, so it's difficult to answer this question without painting everyone with the same brush.

That's because some people who follow God have done so all their lives -- while others used to be atheists but have since come to believe.

Some atheists have disbelieved in God all their lives -- while others used to believe in Him but have since stopped believing.

So, at the end of the day, it all depends on the person.

Answer 7

you're really generalizing there. i don't believe of any of those word to each atheist, or maybe each theist. "they both blindly keep on with the words of others." would not all and distinctive to an volume? once you've been instructed that a million + a million is two, did you're taking a seat there and question it? maximum atheists consciously keen to be atheist after being raised religiously. if you're talking about clinical issues (that are literally not atheist beliefs), we glance on the info. that is what technology is about. "they both are closed-minded to the point of being aggressive with anybody that introduces change recommendations" i could say that, on both area, maximum are not. some theists are truly protective of their beliefs, to the point the position they attack others. particularly a lot each atheist i have ever recognize would not care what persons believe, as long as they retain it to themselves. i'm very open minded, subsequently why i'm the following to communicate and debate. besides the undeniable fact that, in case you mission my reviews, I assume sound reasoning in the back of that mission. "they both have intense superiority themes" nicely theists absolutely do have that total "holier than thou" ingredient happening. no matter if or not they are not attempting to be condescending, the shown actuality that they imagine all and distinctive who believes in yet in a special way is going to hell is a superiority situation. Many atheists do sense like they're smarter than theists at the same time as it contains wondering and reasoning, because theists hardly ever question their beliefs. that's the most precise of your arguments, yet besides the undeniable fact that that's particularly effortless experience. In any argument with 2 sides, both area thinks they have a more effective acceptable argument than the different. "they both favor to structure law in accordance with THEIR beliefs, that is mostly to the different sides detriment" Christians do, and performance. i do not recognize a unmarried atheist that needs to target this besides the undeniable fact that. we do not favor to emphasise atheism on human beings. We merely favor to keep Christianity element of Christian existence, no longer all and distinctive else's. i don't believe of you could structure law in accordance with non-conception in deities besides.

Answer 8

Both I think. Nature in a theological term is "humankind's natural state as distinguished from a state of grace." Religion touts the state of grace; we atheist are in a natural state.

Nurture because many of us atheists were brought up in that atmosphere that believed in the state of grace and If we weren't exposed to it we would not find our natural state.

Answer 9

Nurture

Answer 10

There is evidence that "faith" is actually the result of your genes, making it so no one can choose whether or not they believe in god. This may actually support the idea of predestination, that people who will go to heaven will have faith, and those who are damned won't. Then again, if you have no control over faith in god, then doesn't that contradict religion in it's entirety? Why would the faithful get all the credit when people like me, unable to have faith in a god, are damned? Why damn me for something out of my control?

Answer 11

I think it's both, as well. I think that nature gives us tendencies, and nurture gives the final push, one way or the other.