i know that when i see a skeptic present an argument that is not sound or is generally weak, other skeptics (including myself) will point it out. The last thing we want to see is incompetent polemics.
But christians continuously present arguments here that "ride the short bus" and i can only suppose that the more intellegent christians are deliberately avoiding the task of setting their "kin" straight on those things.
If you are a christian, and you see another christian present a glib argument, like for example any derivative form of "pascal's wager", why don't you chime in to edify your fellow beleivers line of thinking?
Obviously, skeptics themselves don't hold back from correcting those arguments, but when a "unbeliever" corrects them, it only makes "less smart" christians bitter and insolent about the issue.
wouldn't it make more sense for the wiser christians to take a slightly more proactive with the people who are "liabilities" for their own side?
2007-10-01
15:02:05
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality