Atheists - believers who is more immoral, a government who bombs a city where civilain men women and children?

Question

sleep, or the terrorists who flew into the twin towers killing men women and children.

Answer 1

I think it is a tie.

(Nagasaki, Hiroshima)

Answer 2

...Athiest...

Neither are immoral.
The terrorists' religion asks them to do certain things. I may think it's immoral for Jehovah's Witnesses to knock on my door *Knock, knock* "You're wrong, we're right. Do this or you're damned and evil." But they think I'm immoral and need "saved" so that's why they do it.

And our government is retaliating in order to protect our citizens as well as the non-terrorist, innocent citizens of that country so they believe they are completely moral as well.

In both instances, there is the corruption and the soldiers. The soldiers are not the immoral ones. They're doing what they're told to do and believing what they've been raised to believe. The corruption is the immoral force which makes both sides believe that what they're doing is right... but they do it for all the wrong reasons.

Hope I made sense.

Answer 3

It relies upon on what countries you're concerning. In 1st international countries, the two adult males an women people face equivalent hardships. adult males could face dropping their infants after divorce and are oftentimes positioned down with the aid of society without society determining they're doing it. on the different hand, women people in 1st international countries nonetheless face themes like rape, low income, issues having infants whilst working, no maternity go away, or maybe discrimination interior the workplace. nonetheless, women people do have reward that adult males do no longer. In 0.33 international countries or something in between, there is not any question who has it worse.

Answer 4

I honestly fail to understand why there are so many Americans when so many people here don't give a damn about our freedom. What is it going to take for the bleeding hearts to understand that those people don't care about you? They want to own you. They really want to kill you because even though you may be a devout Atheist, they see you as a Christian because to them religion is related to nationality. I do know this because of working with foreign students at KU, yeah, stupid old Kansas but also the center of the evolution/creation debate in the country. Anyway, hey, let's just give up and let them take over our way of life and turn us into their cattle.

Answer 5

Philosophy aside, we shell see.
Sometimes the outcome is worth the horror.
Sometimes not.
As far as the twin towers being attracted, there is no justification!
I read this here, I quoit "if you are not standing behind the troops, kindly stand in front of them". i believe that is how it read.

Answer 6

Terrorists, it was an unprovoked declaration of war. The military tries to minimize civilian casualties but terroist seek to maximize them.

Answer 7

Well, one could say that the terrorists were trying to kill people indiscriminately.

Whereas the government is not trying to kill civilians.


I have asked a similar question for perspective:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071003172036AASNpcJ&pa=FYd1D2bwHTHwLbtiEe05QqcmwR8.gJkvqIWbY67ItmfSkA--&paid=asked&msgr_status=

Answer 8

I really fail to see a difference, though the government should have every ones best interest in mind.

Answer 9

There is a big difference between a declared war and an attack on civilians without warning.

Answer 10

They are both equally "immoral"...and they are both the wrong thing to do.

However, I guess the government should set more of an example instead of causing more blood shed.

Answer 11

They are both mass slaughters, they are the same as eachother