I know what most would say. Of course not. But consider this: The strive of modern technology is to keep people alive longer. Due to this, we have an overpopulation dilemma. When someone gets a disease, we cure the disease, more people are alive to populate the Earth and destroy the environment. We consume our resources at an alarming rate, until our planet is barren. In this light, technology is a cancer. As horrible as it sounds, without technology, people would have shorter lifespans, more people would die and we would solve our population problem. I know the irony of me typing this on Yahoo, but bear with me. Just a theory.
2006-09-27
19:20:19
·
8 answers
·
asked by
DC_Taco
2
in
Other - Society & Culture