I asked 2 questions regarding reproductive choice and the overwhelming majority of responses were it is a personal choice *until one needs public money to feed/raise the child.*
Question 1: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsQb7ic0DsmtFwKEUebXPGjsy6IX?qid=20070421191448AAbPf9l
Question 2:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiobcwaaEp.piiATGUdfv5zsy6IX?qid=20070421193623AASrGXX
If people feel that reproductive choices are so personal, then why do they get in an uproar about abortion? Isn’t abortion simply one more reproductive choice? For all you logicians out there:
Reproductive choice = Personal decision
Abortion = Reproductive choice
THERFORE:
Abortion = Personal choice
Before you answer, think about how many abortions are done to prevent a child from being born to a woman who does not have the financial resources to support it.
If it is a personal choice only until the need for government assistance, then are you saying a pregnant woman in poverty should be *required* to have an abortion to avoid having yet another person grow up on the welfare system? Please explain.
If you commented on childbearing in relation to the need for public assistance in my previous question, I want to hear from you on this.
A couple of facts to help you with your answer:
89% of abortions are done prior to the 12th week of gestation, when the pregnancy is in the EMBRYO stage, and clearly would not survive outside the womb.
48% of all abortions in America are given to women with incomes less than $30,000.
http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html
2007-04-22
04:04:40
·
11 answers
·
asked by
not yet
7