Military - May 2007

2007-05-19 07:28:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

like when they did to Japan in WWII

2007-05-19 07:13:56 · 21 answers · asked by BaSeBaLlKiD721 6

This has been on my mind for some time...


So let's say the U.S. were to have another civil war:



1. Battlefield: USA
2. Time Frame: Today
3. Teams: like i said Navy Marines vs. Army & Air Force



(to answer please put aside all feelings, for example: do not post Semper Fi! just because you were an ex-marine and then dont give me an explanation...haha)

2007-05-19 06:46:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

What adivce can you give me to take the DLAB, what should i study for, should I study anything in the english language?

2007-05-19 06:28:51 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

My thoughts are that the color is for high visibility...but that is just speculation. Why in the world would you want to stick out in a bright yellow suit?

I'm sure there is a reason, even if its just economic (yellow=cheaper??) and was just wondering what the heck it is.

2007-05-19 06:11:33 · 7 answers · asked by herdragonlove 2

2007-05-19 05:56:19 · 14 answers · asked by infoman 2

Is it thankyou.org or something like it

2007-05-19 05:21:36 · 4 answers · asked by Marya M 1

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/25/the-defeatocrats-cheer/

2007-05-19 04:58:04 · 3 answers · asked by turntable 6

2007-05-19 03:24:27 · 12 answers · asked by PACK1009 1

I was not born in america so is it possible that I can become an officer in the us Marines?

2007-05-19 03:04:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Really are there reasonable things to fight with Sri Lankan Sinhalese and Sri Lankan Tamil peoples.or Any other second or thired parties join to spoil those same sri lankans?

2007-05-19 02:27:21 · 2 answers · asked by Kelvin 2

I received info from a recruiter about how I would be able to choose the destination for my next duty assignment or in general as to where I'd like to be stationed or travel overseas but it's got to be within nine months of actually going there and the number of slots available. He said if I didn't procrastinate and be one of the first ones or so to pick before others, then I'd get it most definitely... However, I asked him if the government decided that. He said *I* do emphatically. Is this true?

2007-05-19 02:16:09 · 10 answers · asked by GoldPenny 2

he might be the futcher king why shoul he be kept at home why his troops are at war dosent this show that we shouldent have gone to war with iraq because it to dangrous to send the 3rd in line to the thrown there

2007-05-19 01:59:13 · 22 answers · asked by danstools123 2

Today is Armed Forces Day, fly your flag in support of all who serve. And for all who have given their lives for you and me.

2007-05-19 00:59:10 · 17 answers · asked by Granny 1 7

Who would win in a non-nuclear conventional war?
If The US With Canada and mexico went to war with the European Union.

2007-05-19 00:55:27 · 19 answers · asked by Mr M 3

* Original nation = Palestinians

2007-05-18 23:51:14 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-18 23:27:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Iraq in my opinion is now officially a quagmire , see link - http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/quagmire/

The only way for the U.S. to win this war and come out looking good is to level Iraq . Don't get me wrong I am not a person who supports senseless slaughter but when the rest of the world looks at the U.S. they see the most powerful nation in the world today , getting defeated once again by gorilla warfare { a tactic a 11 year old would know how to use } . The U.S. leveling Iraq is imperative to our interests { wether people want to realize it or not } and also to our national image which lets be honest - is not good and hasn't been for years . We need to show the world whoever dares attack us or any of our interests will lose and the way to do that is not by diplomacy , not by pieces of paper , not by new schools , not by turning on electricity in Iraq , not by debates which are nothing but a waste of time and finally not by calling Bush names { which accomplishes nothing } - we need to level it , to show the world and people everywhere we will not cow down to people who want to destroy us , we will not listen to the U.N. { United Nations or United for Nonsense as I like to call them } , we will not sit by and let our boys die , we will not and we can not . In conclusion Iraq needs to be leveled to show the world - attack us and it will be at your peril because you will lose .

Anyone agree ?

2007-05-18 22:24:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Whenever our troops move about in Iraq, they do so in convoys along predictable roadways.

Since we don't have enough troops to watch these roads continuously, the bombs get planted along the way and it is only a matter of time before our troops will pass by.

These roads are just like the LINEAR TRACKS of a SHOOTING GALLERY that convey the designated targets back and forth until safety is reached at either end of the trip.

It is so sad to see our troops having to suffer the same fate as that of a shooting gallery target that travels back and forth along a specific linear path.

There is something so patently absurd and unfair about this scenario.

2007-05-18 21:20:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are thousands of Americans (and associates) trapped in the Green Zone. An easy stationary and huge target just chuck full of infidels and unholy Muslims. Why don't they lob at least a few (of the thousands) chemical or Anthax bombs into that place?
Why would they wait for America to invade yet another country to use the WMDs?
Why wouldn't they have used them when Israel was inside Lebanon?
What better opportunities could there possibly be?

Of course to the delusional who still think Saddam gave the WMDs to his arch-enemies Syria and/or Iran my answer is THERE WERE/ARE NO WMDs IN IRAQ WHEN BUSH INVADED.

2007-05-18 21:02:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

We could call the new country, CANUSA.

2007-05-18 19:23:18 · 14 answers · asked by dungheap 1

2007-05-18 18:14:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-18 17:38:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean usually when not at war you have 3 man rooms..my idea is for non rate would be 2 men and one woman per room...during the days when they men are at thier jobs they could clean the room..wash , iron square away the uniforms and polish boots..and when the day is done they are committed to have sex when the men return home...they still must pt in the morning however to maintain a nice body..

it would reduce drunken nites out at bars for military guys trying to get laid..and usually getting in trouble..reduce servisemen getting hookers ..and would boost morale..re-enlistment rates would go up drastically as well.

it may seem like it objectifies women a lil bit..but the one's who signed up would no what they were getting into before hand..it would be also great training if they ever want to be houswives some day...

2007-05-18 16:20:47 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-18 16:01:18 · 14 answers · asked by Justin P 1

Mr. Bush says support our troops. Now he is showing his support by turning down a 3.5 percent pay raise for them. He says that 3 percent is enough. I say 10 percent is about right. What does anyone else have to say about the Bush support for our troops???

2007-05-18 15:51:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-18 15:29:30 · 12 answers · asked by Porschescere 2

Is it just one big reason or are there many reasons that caused
the U.S. Civil War? Thank you.

2007-05-18 15:22:36 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

D G Tremblay Flight Sgt from Manitoba Canada

2007-05-18 13:48:57 · 3 answers · asked by Lorraine B 1

Sounds good to me.They have good armies and speek english.

2007-05-18 13:48:08 · 9 answers · asked by Michigan rules 1