If Jihad Has Iraq's WMDs To Use Against USA, What Are they Waiting For?

Question

There are thousands of Americans (and associates) trapped in the Green Zone. An easy stationary and huge target just chuck full of infidels and unholy Muslims. Why don't they lob at least a few (of the thousands) chemical or Anthax bombs into that place?
Why would they wait for America to invade yet another country to use the WMDs?
Why wouldn't they have used them when Israel was inside Lebanon?
What better opportunities could there possibly be?

Of course to the delusional who still think Saddam gave the WMDs to his arch-enemies Syria and/or Iran my answer is THERE WERE/ARE NO WMDs IN IRAQ WHEN BUSH INVADED.

Answer 1

Of course THEY DONT HAVE ANY.
Of course WE (bushbunch EVIL Usa) dont in fact have--or ever had terriorist.

but keep saying terriorist terriorist...and FOOLS believe.

also of course...if they had them, they woulnt use them and harm there own people. They are not evil people.
However, EVIL leaders will quickly harm their own FOOLS. Then use the harmed FOOLS to attack innocent people and steal oil from them, by fooling the FOOLS that innocent people harmed them.

Answer 2

An anology for you.
Say you want to beat someone up but his brother is visiting from college, he is on the football team and will eat you for lunch.
Do you go ahead and try and beat him or do you wait a week and take him when he his brither returns to school?

You would definately wait, sometimes in War it is prudent to strike at the right time.
Look at D-day for example they waited for many factors to come into play.
Hitler had a feeling they were going to go for Normandy but all his generals said Calais.
It was nothing short of a miracle it even took place, now to address your question, let me ask you a question?
Does Israel have the bomb?

Of course they do. Everyone know this, but they have never tested it, according to your wisdom or lack thereof, they don't have it.
They have never tested it or even when they had many "perfect" chances to use it, they chose not to.
What would be the world fallout from them using WMD's, public opinion would shift back to America and they are experts at the PR game, hence the station Al-jeezera.
Yeah and Saddam gassed the kurds with laughing gas.
What a joke u are.

Answer 3

correction: Jihad=Holy War.
I suppose you meant Al-Qaida has Iraq's WMD's....
Al-Qaida is not a recognized government, they are terrorists, insurgents, blah, blah.
The green zone is heavily protected (not perfect, but protected). It isn't just opent range.
I must be delusional, because those weapons were shipped out of the country and/or still in underground bunkers.
If he had no WMD's, why did he keep stalling U.N. inspectors to inspect these facilities? He wasn't hiding hooka pipes. You must be young and naive, so I don't hold this question against you because you just don't know any better. To get a little better perspective, turn off CNN, ABC, and turn on FOX every once in a while.
And, learn to think critically.

Answer 4

They have, but Saddam's WMD were chemicals and not bio hazzards. Some IEDs had chemical shells as part of the devices. Chemicals have to be used in large amounts and in a confined space to work well. In WWI mustard gas at its height had a casualty rate of 10%.

Answer 5

Because if they did then the rest of the world would annihilate them. reason being no one would want to be next. and think about it if you use a nuclear weapon on another country you are not only using it on that country but yourself also. to use a nuclear weapon would almost certainly mean the end of everything would it not? When I use the term weapon I mean large missile Sadamn was in a pickle if he said he had weapons then he was in trouble if he did not have weapons then he was a target to all other countries. so he said nothing.

Answer 6

If he had no WMD, how did he gas his own people?

Answer 7

For Bush to tell them the "Ok!"

Answer 8

They can't use them, even if they had them. If they did, any sympathy from the west would be gone.