2007-05-18 18:14:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
research vietnam, research india/pakistan
2007-05-18 19:42:26 · answer #1 · answered by Jessy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same thing that happens with sharks that go after a bloody animal. Since oil drilling no longer has to be done up and down, neighboring countries could drill underneath Iraq and steal the oil while all the factions fight on the top side. The winner will find all the Iraqi oil gone.
2007-05-18 23:45:43 · answer #2 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ill tell u exactly what will happen. the sunni and shi'ites as of right now fight each other in small doses and in various parts of the country. we are the ones stopping them from making it an all out civil war, which is exactly what will happen if we pull out tomorrow. also, iran and saudi arabia will find it a perfect opportunity to attack each other and they will use iraq to get to each other so they dont destroy their own countries. which iran is already doing but it will be 10 times worse if we werent here. (im in the army and ive been here for 9 months by the way)
2007-05-18 23:05:56 · answer #3 · answered by goalie16_99 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You ask too many questions at as quickly as, yet i will attempt to respond to them succintly. What would happen to Iraq? that is going to devolve into chaos in areas, mutually as different areas would be extremely unscathed. The Shiites will win the civil war, and al qa'ida would be ran out by using them, and by using Sunnis who will blame them for the loss. would we be criticized for conserving a watchful eye over them or would all and sundry desire us to easily bypass away them be? we can be criticised the two way. How long would it not take previously we've been attacked returned? incorrect question. The terrorists on no account stopped attempting to attack us. seem at all the incidents in l. a., citadel Dix, Miami, and countless others. you desire to appreciate while will they be sucessful returned? no person knows. If we've been given attacked returned, would we nevertheless be the undesirable adult adult males for protecting ourselves? If we are attacking the incorrect human beings, sure. because we are so hated for liberating Iraq from Saddams rule, how would the international view us if we refused help out yet another usa in that way? As I mentioned, we can be criticised the two way. that is impossible to make all and sundry chuffed. very final question, why do such countless individuals sympathize with the terrorists? only because of the fact somebody does not consider the moronic technique we are employing, does no longer mean they sympathize with the terrorists. on the different hand, u.s. sympathises with terrorists all the time. The Irish Republican military have been given money from Irish individuals interior the U. S., we refuse to extradite admitted terrorist Luis Posada Carriles to Cuba because of the fact he assaults a regime we do in comparison to, and we turn a blind eye to terror communities like the MEK and PKK for an identical reason. the U. S. has no situation with terrorists as long as they're struggling with against somebody we do in comparison to. that is why the finished "war on terror" is a stupid thank you to describe the conflict.
2016-12-29 12:43:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing........he destroyed the country anyway, i don't remeber that during the years of saddam, so many people died. leaving or staying makes no difference except that the american tax money will be used maybe for better american social security or maybe better health insurance or maybe the government will reduce taxes for americans?
2007-05-18 20:39:23 · answer #5 · answered by Rector 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there is be more chaos in Iraq
2007-05-18 19:45:50 · answer #6 · answered by dk 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋