Military - February 2007

will they be upgraded or dismantled?

2007-02-14 02:27:25 · 7 answers · asked by IshotJR 2

2007-02-14 02:23:23 · 11 answers · asked by IshotJR 2

They are terrorists.

2007-02-14 02:21:06 · 9 answers · asked by hamthugger 4

I have a Senior Project that I have to make 2 surveys for. 1 for civilians and another for soldiers (active or retired doesn't matter). I have to get 50 people and soldiers to take the one that is specifically for them. I know very few military people and only a few can help me out (many of them are in Iraq or training). The project is about the way the media covers the war in Iraq. While the surveys ask your opinion and sources for your information. If you really would help me by taking this survey I will contact you (just to warn you ahead of time).
Thank you,
CadetKAt

2007-02-14 02:13:36 · 9 answers · asked by cadetkat 1

Can someone please tell me what they do at these things and what I am suppose to wear and I am not wearing a prom dress I have been out of high school for 13 years.....

2007-02-14 02:10:04 · 5 answers · asked by HARWOODH 3

I seems to me that if you join the armed services, you would want the chance to put your training to work. I did, I came out of the Marines in 1998 and knew the whole time I might have to go ANYPLACE at ANYTIME and I went to a few places I really didn't want to. So why join if you don't want to fight, the food isn't that good.

2007-02-14 02:02:45 · 15 answers · asked by Will N 2

2007-02-14 01:51:29 · 16 answers · asked by DrPepper 6

2007-02-14 01:43:09 · 16 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7

2007-02-14 01:36:23 · 9 answers · asked by ? 2

say the "base pay" is $1632.00 for a particular rank. Does that amount show on each check, or is that base pay per month? Thanks in advance.

2007-02-14 01:35:53 · 11 answers · asked by A H 1

What does this mean for the troops, their morale, and for America?

2007-02-14 01:22:39 · 10 answers · asked by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6

In WW2 the Nazis lied to their people about an attack by Poles as an excuse to invade. They then invaded, plundered and murdered their way through the country. In 2002 the American government lied to its people about weapons of mass destruction. They invaded and continue to plunder and murder their way through Iraq. Are Bush and his cronies the new Nazis? Should the US be renaimed the Fourth Reich?

2007-02-14 01:10:53 · 11 answers · asked by Sean D 2

Im 5'7 197lbs as of 2/14/2007

according to the wieght chart i should weigh 175

I need to lose about 17 - 22lbs, help??

2007-02-14 00:59:34 · 12 answers · asked by million dollar dreams 1

The German arny got to within 20 miles of downtown Moscow. All the commies fleed for Siberia, but The German army got bogged down, because of the severe Winter weather. If the Germans had gone into Russia just one week earlier, the communist would have been destroyed and there would not have been any wars after that. When the commies hauled *** out of Moscow, Stalin saw this and it pisseed him off. This is why he purged so many. The Germans fought a foe outnumbered 4 to 1. They tried to save the world from communism. Over a million Russians joined the Germans in their fight against communism. The Germans had seen what communism had done to Russia and they didn't want it, either. Western Europe owes the Germans a debt of gratitude for fighting WWII. The Germans learned that the Russians were amassing troops near their border and they knew this meant war. So they decided to attack first. The communist tried to take Spain but the Spaniards fought them violently and drove them out.

2007-02-14 00:56:11 · 4 answers · asked by Bessie H 1

Lets say an american bomb ( well meaning good bomb) kills 20 people in a Muslim city.

All of those people had mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, friends..that are not gonna be happy. The bomb mighta got a so-called terrorist or two ...BUT how many did you create??? These people are just going to LOVE americans as they bury their dead.

Bush"s WAR has created more terrorists than Al Queda, in fact this war is exactly what Bin Laden wanted

2007-02-14 00:50:22 · 17 answers · asked by rattlecattle717 1

"Because they cannot defeat Americans on the battlefield, al-Qaida and terrorist sympathizers around the world are trying to divide us here at home," said Boehner, R-Ohio. "Over the next few days, we have an opportunity to show our enemies that we will not take the bait."

Isn't the above baseless and coward suggestion? If you battle with the lastest technology and put on the self lable of the "Super Power", why cant others fight with you in different ways and continue to damage your Self Lable? Opinions suggests that US must leave Iraq.

2007-02-14 00:13:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

placed machinegun fire, what would be the most appropriate action to take?

2007-02-14 00:09:41 · 20 answers · asked by Beaujock 1

2007-02-14 00:06:46 · 33 answers · asked by tulip 4

was it like the book and the film title " a bridge to far"?

2007-02-13 23:39:38 · 10 answers · asked by Just for Laughs 4

Since we are leaving the Iraqis dealing with their problems now, why are we still there? Is the insurgency so strong that the actual Iraqi government could collapse?... or is about holding the ground for future military actions in the region?...or maybe we are just trying to avoid a civil war, which in my opinion it already started..?

2007-02-13 23:07:54 · 10 answers · asked by Mark N 2

really need a list of places where they are

2007-02-13 22:43:55 · 5 answers · asked by david r 1

The show of Iraq or Afghanistan does not prove its super power title. In the past, USA had avoided direct confrontation with USSR. Dropping the Atom Bomb on Japan few decades ago had made them powerful in the world...but the current scene is different. I think USA should fight with China to know what the tough war really means? It will be a fantastic lesson for all big mouths (mostly Americans giving warnings to the world)

2007-02-13 22:10:13 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-13 22:04:25 · 30 answers · asked by murphcxr 2

1 / Eisenhower and Roosevelt had allowed him too?
2 / he would have been given enough supplies and resources to carry out the task?

2007-02-13 22:02:22 · 8 answers · asked by Drop the donkey 2

Hey there everyone. this is to navy personnel only with knowledge of high year tenure. my husband is getting out of the Navy in May do to high year tenure. If your seperating from the Navy I heard that your best to start the process to seperate a year before you do. well My husband got transfered to a command in Japan and the command hasnt been very help to any of it's sailors. My husband put in chits several times to take TAP and they were lost or denied. Now he has requested to have his 30 days house hunters leave or seperation leave and they wont grant it to him and yet he still hasnt even had TAP. Does anyone know what He should do to get this matter situated. or who he should talk to if his cheif is not helping him?

2007-02-13 21:57:52 · 5 answers · asked by envisiondreaming 2

If there is, where?

2007-02-13 21:55:45 · 8 answers · asked by Charlie 1

Will it be N Korea?
CHINA? Russia? Iran? Syria? Venezuela (Chavez)? Pakistan? the US maybe??
State your scenario

2007-02-13 21:47:49 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

what are the positive and negative effects?

2007-02-13 20:51:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was looking at Wikipedia the other day, I came across the Royal Navy page. I saw our 'Invincible' class aircraft carriers and compared them to Americas ships. The result; we have two (one in a dry dock) and they carry ten times less than the 10+ ships they have!! I was shocked but not surprised. Our soliders are also called 'The Borrowers' by the American forces in Iraq because of the amount of equipment they have to borrow. Is the British Army just for show because it doesn't look like a serious force!!!???

2007-02-13 20:50:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-13 20:44:38 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous