English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Military - January 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Military

Im considering joining the navy as an enlistee. I wan't to sighn up as a arms specialist to help my future careear in law enforcment. While Im enlisted and on active duty, is it possible to obtain a college degree?

My recruiter say's yes.... but c'mon--he's a recruiter.

2007-01-10 17:42:00 · 13 answers · asked by yellowmedia 3

If you really cared, you'd have enlisted.

Hypocrites.

2007-01-10 17:39:28 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-10 17:29:56 · 31 answers · asked by meghana 1

Of course, I try to love all humans.

My question is though, would it be better to pull out of Iraq, then watch the collapse of the Iraqi government that would tear that country apart and result in mass killings on an unimaginable scale, then send our troops BACK in to help establish an actual working government OR send in more troops in hopes that we can protect and If we increase our support at this crucial moment and help the Iraqis break the current cycle of violence, we can hasten the day our troops begin coming home while realizing that there will be MORE casualities from both countries.

What I'm NOT asking you is to tell me how wrong I am for being a Bush supporter. What I want is your OWN opinion relating to the question I posted above.

BTW, we have no way of really knowing which stragedy would cause more casualities (sp).


My so called source "http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=MTMIS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT"

Thanks!

2007-01-10 17:26:29 · 24 answers · asked by †♥mslamom♥† 3

Bush said he will send about 21,000 more troops to the civil war in Iraq. Why not send a much larger number? The original strategy was deeply flawed, and clearly one of the reasons was that far too few troops were sent.

Before the war began, on U.S. general said that it would take 'hundreads of thousands' of troops to occupy Iraq and 'win the peace'.

Tonight, I heard one expert say that about 250,000 troops would be realisitic in terms of what is required to do the job.

So why not return to the 'Powell Doctrine' and use overwhelming force, which tends to result in the quickest victories with the fewest losses.

But all Bush is doing is increasing troop numbers by about 15 percent.

What will this do? Will it work? Why doesn't Bush send far more, since that would probably be the best hope for success?

2007-01-10 17:24:23 · 23 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

1. No Muslim suicide bomber
2. No Islamic terrorist
3. No Islamic extremist

In the 10th century, during the golden age of Islam, the Muslims, Jews and Christian live side by side as neighbour happily. It all change after the Normans take over Jerusalam, they diminished the Muslim...

Sad world

2007-01-10 17:04:47 · 30 answers · asked by movexz 1

Also, at the time the Boulton Paul Defiants were being considered for the RAF, were there any protests raised about the unusual gun platform?

2007-01-10 16:59:17 · 1 answers · asked by Santa C 3

What say you.

2007-01-10 16:57:44 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Outside the embassy : A protester displays a glove calling for US troops to leave the Philippines as she takes part in a demonstration outside the US embassy in Manila, condemning the US government and Philippine President Gloria Arroyo for allowing a US Marine convicted of raping a Filipina to be transferred to embassy custody while his case is being appealed.

2007-01-10 16:54:21 · 8 answers · asked by spike_mae 1

Now that Saddam is gone, there is no WMD, what we want to acheive now in Iraq ? Why don't we leave Iraq to Iraqis ? Why risk our life there ?

2007-01-10 16:35:39 · 10 answers · asked by inin 6

2007-01-10 16:28:25 · 4 answers · asked by Lakers 2010 Champs!!!! 4

in a nuclear war scenario?

2007-01-10 16:27:46 · 3 answers · asked by doofoolio 4

of Northern Virigina?

2007-01-10 16:24:43 · 7 answers · asked by doofoolio 4

Don't you think its time he brings them home and let Iraq take care of their own territory?

2007-01-10 16:19:05 · 12 answers · asked by Ms Lety 7

2007-01-10 16:17:23 · 34 answers · asked by shermynewstart 7

Do you get to choose if you are actually a pilot, or is it something you are chosen for?

2007-01-10 16:06:13 · 5 answers · asked by thedumping 1

tonight Bush said that Malaki's forces will fight the millitias in Bagdad, will he follow through on it or the question above will correct the democratic puppets problem of submission?

2007-01-10 15:59:44 · 2 answers · asked by lovefights 3

I think what you are really saying is that you don't support the war.Two diferent entities.Our troops are fighting for you're right & safty.Suporters are welcome to weigh in on this Question too.

2007-01-10 15:57:17 · 11 answers · asked by jimbobob 4

2007-01-10 15:55:01 · 19 answers · asked by waterfunners 2

If Bush did not think of it, all aspects of war must be considered.

2007-01-10 15:54:41 · 12 answers · asked by Lou B 4

But where does it all end. Suppose by Christmas of 2007 the violence is reduced to minimum and the troops are back for Christmas.

A week later matter the Iraqi sectarian tribes start fighting each other again. Then what?

2007-01-10 15:52:47 · 17 answers · asked by vinod s 4

how can they say they support the troops. Have they now been exposed for the hypercrites that they are.

2007-01-10 15:44:59 · 16 answers · asked by Ibredd 7

Like after my boyfriend graduated from basic last june, he was told he was going to be either deployed right away or wait over a year, depending on which division he was put in.

Well he was put in the one where he has to wait over a year.

Anyways, they had him scheduald to deploy not til august, can that change now that bush wants more troops? *where he is wasn't mentioned where they are deploying more troops from*

2007-01-10 15:38:47 · 11 answers · asked by ♥Brown Eyed Girl ♥ 5

There is a petition to stop funding for the war in Iraq (Sen. John Edwards). I am tired of this crap. My husband is in the military , and for a looong time I was standing by our presidents side...not budging out of pure respect for our so called "leader"...Gung Ho American! Well, my patience has run VERY thin with this man and his "Plans"....I believe our troops SHOULD be returned home. What is everyones thoughts on this. ANd to get back to my question.....my worry is, can Bush still send troops over without funding? Will he do it regardless?

2007-01-10 15:28:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

1

is anyone out there married to someone in the coast guard? and if so how much does it suck? my hubby is most likely leaving in june to go to boot camp, we live in miami and own a house, have one kid and now i want another one.....i heard we are going to have to move around a lot......that bites :(

2007-01-10 15:23:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you think of his strategy?

2007-01-10 15:14:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers