Suppose person "A" has put themselves into a situation where person "B" is going to give them no choice but to kill them in order to save "A"'s own life. Suppose "A" know about this condition in advance, but entered into the situation anyway. "B" would not otherwise be harming "A" or any of "A"'s family, property, etc... but would definitely try to kill "A" once the situation was initated. Assume the situation itself is not an illegal action on either person's part.
The situation occurs, and "A" ends up successfully killing "B" as once the situation began, there was absolutely no other way for "A" to survive, and "A" knew this would be the eventual outcome.
In various jurisdictions, would this be more likely to be treated as self-defense, pre-meditated murder or some quasi-hybrid of the two?
2007-11-30
15:32:39
·
11 answers
·
asked by
uncleclover
5