iam doing a case about dr. kevorkian at school...iam the defense..i have to tell why what dr kevorkian did was not considered homocide to his patients (dont ask why or dnt go against it, the teacher made us do this assignment..thank u
Think about it, every doctor has a hard time trying to save their patients from death or from a terminally ill patient. Then what are you going to do after you fail and cant save the humans life. Why does our government have the right to determine our wishes on death. Hell they already run how we live. The police can determine our death, with the electric chair.. And what about God. God gave us life, and God can take it away when every God feels like it. Yes God had secured his powers not to interfere with humans lives. Unlike Dr. Kevorkian, his patients want to die. Look and Thomas Youk he had ALS Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. it’s a disease that causes muscle weakness, were you can function your body easily. Thomas had this pain, and there was no cure for it. So which would you rather choose, trying to save a patients life, by using so much technology and so much antibiotics and wasting so much blood, and then after all that you fail to save the patients life or would you choose to end your life in a fast way without suffering most of your going suspect.
2007-09-23
14:03:55
·
2 answers
·
asked by
scorpion
1