Government - October 2007

The war in Iraq will have cost in 2017, 2.400.000.000.000 billion dollars in the United States and there are 300.000.000 million of living in the United States. If the gouvernement will have given this money to the people ,if I calculation well ,that does 8000 dollars by living.
what do you think about this ?

2007-10-25 03:45:23 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 03:43:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

When you add up all of the things that happened in the administration before him(USS Cole, Kobar Towers, etc..), and then consider that 9-11 happened because those things were not taken care of properly, how is any of this President Bush fault??

2007-10-25 02:18:16 · 20 answers · asked by jvwatson4 2

2007-10-25 00:58:31 · 8 answers · asked by klunk 3

If you were made the Prime Minister, how would you tackle and eradicate these two major problems?

2007-10-25 00:52:00 · 7 answers · asked by Ap 1

Money is simply a widely-owned commodity used to facilitate the exchange of goods. There is nothing evil about it.

Government, on the other hand, has murdered millions, if not billions of people throughout history (especially in its genocidal "wars"), runs the largest protection racket of all time (the protection money of course is euphemistically referred to as "taxes"), and constantly enslaves people by engaging in the immoral act of obstructing a consensual activity. Government was responsible for the institution of slavery and itself routinely uses slavery for its acts of mass murder that it calls "wars."

Why is it that so many people accuse money of being the root of all evil when it is very obvious that government is the true root of all evil?

2007-10-24 19:16:18 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 18:55:16 · 1 answers · asked by Jose O 1

2007-10-24 18:48:05 · 6 answers · asked by peace 3

Hi, I have a friend who was evicted, and now I do no know where he is. Is there anyway I can go about finding this stuff? Do I need to go to the government? HELP?!

2007-10-24 18:31:52 · 3 answers · asked by SillyGirl 1

2007-10-24 18:14:09 · 15 answers · asked by Shan O 1

please tell me how much u hate him just like me!!!give resons to!!!lol this sould be fun!!

2007-10-24 17:13:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 16:46:08 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 16:25:15 · 9 answers · asked by lexybaby 1

when I went back it didn't have a heading. It was on the Legislative and Judicial Branches and they were worried it was taking the form of Fascism. How do we find out what will put us on the 'enemy combatant' list on Internet when FB Ihas announced war protesters will be put on Criminal DataBase(before anyone doubts this just look it up)?

2007-10-24 16:00:44 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 15:58:18 · 3 answers · asked by maui67camaro 2

2007-10-24 15:53:57 · 11 answers · asked by Lost. at. Sea. 7

2007-10-24 15:49:49 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

hello to those who are into politics but can someone please explain how the government works in south africa? such as if they have monarchy?

2007-10-24 15:38:11 · 2 answers · asked by Piccolina bella21 1

As of this time SCOTUS has denied Cert in cases involving 1st Amendment several times. Why - as this a capstone of rights under the Declaration of Independence?

2007-10-24 15:32:50 · 5 answers · asked by doubleolly 5

When President Bush vetoed health care for millions of children, U.S. Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Midland, had a choice: Stand with Bush or stand up for kids back home. He chose Bush, and was one of just a few votes blocking Congress from overriding the president's veto. As a result, millions of kids and their families could suffer.

When children are sick, they should be able to see a doctor. As Bush and the Republicans spend billions per week in Iraq, there's no excuse for not taking care of our kids back home.

This isn't a Republican or Democrat issue. A recent CBS poll shows that eight of 10 Americans support the kids' health care bill passed by the Democratic Congress, including a majority of Republican voters. Why is our representative so out of touch? Democrats have vowed to bring the kids' health bill back up, insisting that it cover 10 million children. There will be major political consequences for Republicans in 2008 if Conaway and others keep voting against kids' health care.

2007-10-24 15:29:15 · 5 answers · asked by Texas Democrat 3

During the Great Depression it seemed that like all presidents, FDR and Hoover recieved large amounts of criticism from the american people. However, they did what they thought was best, and also took risks. When FDR created the New Deal I doubt he was one hundred percent sure of the impact, and even less people liked all of his ideas. Even so he brought America out of the depression. My question is basically in this age can a president still successfully take risks without results severely damaging our country? And also should the president always make decisions will the knowledge of how the people will react?

2007-10-24 15:21:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why might a governor of a state be reluctant to call for federal troops in the event that a violence breaks out?

Is it because there is a money issue there. like the state can only get so much money from federal aid so much and they would rather put it to something else????

2007-10-24 15:14:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

By denial of Cert to so many cases every year SCOTUS is legislating and establishing more law than the Congress. This seems to also be a refusal of due process as guaranteed by the Constitution

2007-10-24 15:06:08 · 4 answers · asked by doubleolly 5

2007-10-24 15:02:46 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

When the President and Vice President both die, who takes over?
a) Find out the next 17 offices (as defined in the 20th and 25th Amendments to the Unites States Constitution, and the Presidential Succession Law of 1947) that will take over, and in what order.
b) Then, tell me who currently holds each such office

thanks sooo much!!!

2007-10-24 14:59:50 · 5 answers · asked by ~Unpredictable~ 2

Our federal government has given it's view of "marriage", being the union of one man and one woman.

We are beginning to see the movement for civil unions. Beginning in January of 2008, 10 states, plus D.C., will have offer civil unions.

Are they recognized, or are they not? We are only defining marriage, but not the "civil unions" or "domestic partnerships".

2007-10-24 14:25:10 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

and how many of the goverment belong to an association!

2007-10-24 14:15:31 · 2 answers · asked by raymondo C 3

U.S history and politics

2007-10-24 13:49:25 · 11 answers · asked by samson w 1

2007-10-24 13:43:51 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

How the goverment should help us to eat helthtier

2007-10-24 13:39:41 · 7 answers · asked by Jose A 1