Government - September 2006

We will spend billions to help the people of Iraq have a better country and better future but are opposed to letting Mexicans come here for a better country and a better future, I don't understand it..........

You can say " illegals broke the law " well Iraqis aren't exactly saints or friends of the USA either, and the reason we went there was because they broke international law so why help Iraqis when they break the law but not mexicans?

2006-09-22 07:09:58 · 17 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6

2006-09-22 06:50:28 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

to Bush's war on terror? If true, would that be considered blackmail? This is getting very bizarre, almost unbelievable. Is the media trying to ignore this story, like it tries to ignore anti-American stories (like the level of corruption in the Iraqi occupation)?

It must be fun being Musharef with India threatening war, the Islamists trying to blow him up, and the USA threatening to bomb him.

2006-09-22 06:46:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Only because some countrys dont do what it said, are evil?
The american people dont think that the whole "terrorism" its because of Bush?
If america stop killing people in other countrys, maybe they´re stop trying to kill us.

2006-09-22 06:40:29 · 14 answers · asked by A voice 1

2006-09-22 06:24:52 · 11 answers · asked by JF 4

Is everything so perfect here that we have money to give away?


If you ask where is your proof? I would ask you where do you think the BILLIONS of dollars are going?

2006-09-22 06:23:56 · 13 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6

What have you seen in Iraq that makes you believe the US military is capable of succeeding in the middle east?

2006-09-22 06:13:39 · 16 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6

The day he was inaugurated he gave an order for the US military to do a "flyover" into the No Fly zone in Iraq. I wonder if he asked the pilot to flip Saddam the bird?

The second thing he did was cut the funding for International family planning effectively ending the only health care many women in remote areas receive at all. Why? Because he promised the Christian right that he would end abortion and birth control wherever he could as president. Those clients do pre natal care for expectant mothers, regular health care visits, inoculations for children and disease control. I wonder how many women and children died as a direct result of his helping out the Christian right's agenda to take us all back to the 1500's?

2006-09-22 06:00:51 · 9 answers · asked by Mimi Di 4

I think it would be very arrogant of him to show up in the states if he was. What is it about him that looks the same as the hostage takers, The dark skin and hair.. I mean there are likely a thousand people in Iran that resemble him enough to maybe mistake him for someone else... We are talking like 30 years ago

it has been Shown that eye witness accounts in domestic cases are wrong about the perpetrator over 50 percent of the time and that is when the cases are still fresh , but a few of the hostages of 79 are saying the Iranian president was one of those hostage takers... Its a bit of a stretch but not in the realm of impossibility, but I think I would require more proof then an eye witness identification from a 30 year old case..

Due to the fact it was the only aggressive act perpetrated by the Iranians on another country in like 100 years I can at least say thousands of Americans didn't die because of it..They just had some time taken away. can you compair that to today ?

2006-09-22 05:59:29 · 3 answers · asked by Shawn S 3

2006-09-22 05:54:40 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-22 05:54:00 · 21 answers · asked by hdhothar 1

2006-09-22 05:42:20 · 10 answers · asked by sweet_n_sexy_713 1

The goverment is transporting nuclear waste through our towns. Do you think they should be allowed to do this?

2006-09-22 05:31:04 · 11 answers · asked by a_rose_by_another_name 3

2006-09-22 05:26:29 · 7 answers · asked by josh 1

Please provide reference

2006-09-22 05:23:54 · 8 answers · asked by q2003 4

2006-09-22 05:22:08 · 15 answers · asked by Lipstick 4

So far, I've seen nothing to eliminate the possibility that Bush is on the same course as Hitler. And I've seen far too many analogies to dismiss the possibility. The propaganda. The lies. The rhetoric. The nationalism. The flag waving. The pretext of 'preventive war'. The flaunting of international law and international standards of justice. The threats against protesters. The invasion of a non-threatening sovereign nation. The occupation of a hostile country. The promises of prosperity and security. The spying on ordinary citizens. The arrogant triumphant pride in military conquest. The establishment of 'Homeland Security'. The dehumanization of 'foreigners'. The total lack of interest in the victims of government policy.The growing prosperity from military ventures. Closed extralegal internment camps. The militarization of domestic police. Media blackout of non-approved issues. blacklisting of protesters - including the no-fly lists and photographing dissenters at rallies...

2006-09-22 05:15:14 · 27 answers · asked by Cid2006 2

Is he still part of the Bush administration, and if he isn't, why not?

2006-09-22 04:58:22 · 12 answers · asked by t c 3

Given that the extreme-right wing BNP claim to have made substantial gains in their youth division, shouldn't his warning have applied to all families, whever their ethnic orientation?

2006-09-22 04:45:57 · 21 answers · asked by El Barno 1

These are the laws in the UK at the moment so I was just interested, would there be social meltdown?

2006-09-22 04:43:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-22 04:34:16 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The UN translator sounds incredulous about his very barbed remarks.

2006-09-22 04:20:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-22 04:01:27 · 7 answers · asked by Karen H 1

State you answer by telling me if you think Bush is doing a good job as President or not.
I no I don't think he is.

2006-09-22 04:00:36 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Repeal and replace the 14th Amendment. Section 1 of the 14th has three consecutive clauses that are vague and have been misused and abused by the Courts so much that it makes me want to stay away from the ballot box for the rest of my life.

Constitutional law ought to constitute a set of rules so that government (the level of government being commanded) can know what it can or cannot do. Constitutional law ought to "provide guidance and discipline for the legislature, which is entitled to know what kind of laws it may pass," and it ought to "mark the limit of [the Court's] authority." (From Romer v. Evans, 1996; morally correct rhetoric but completely hypocritical in reality.)

Declare that the 14th is repealed (we obviously don't need the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sections of it any more) and is replaced with more clearly stated rules for the states to obey.

To be continued.

2006-09-22 03:40:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-22 03:17:17 · 9 answers · asked by Lorraine R 1

2006-09-22 02:24:25 · 19 answers · asked by Jafar 1

If you are a non - U.S. citizen living outside it's borders what is your perception of U.S. foreign policy? How do you feel about President Bush?

Is your opinion shaped by this policy or by what you know of the people?
Would you mind mentioning your country?

2006-09-22 02:03:47 · 12 answers · asked by John B 5

Where is he know and what is he doing?

2006-09-22 01:54:05 · 12 answers · asked by PICKLES 1

People had warns to evac. Because some stayed behind aren't they partly to blame? Bush didn't build the dam and i think there mayor should take most of blame not bush what do u think?

2006-09-22 01:42:57 · 16 answers · asked by H8Ful_Chic 1