Government - September 2006

HELP I NEED THIS FOR SCHOOL IN LIKE AN HOUR....

2006-09-22 01:06:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

i m not trying to fuel hate so dont go crazy with answers but this is for british people, what would it take to actually piss us off what would it take to make us stand up for what we believe because our free speech is gone, our leaders are laughing stocks (poodle blair on bushes lap) and our religious figures have their pictures burnt and we have people who stand here on TV and disply signs that say britain you re 9/11 is coming , in france it takes nothing to make them burn there sheep (i am not condoning burning livestock) but does anyone think that we will ever care or are we just the laziest country in the world

2006-09-22 00:59:46 · 28 answers · asked by wedgewoo 1

I just lmfao at them!!

2006-09-22 00:47:41 · 6 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5

does anyone out there actually think the government is looking out for its people or are just out to get themselves more rich by doing really stupid things like killing millions of people and pissing off loadsa crazy people (can i say thankyou to peeps who have answereed my other questions they are really good i love finding out peoples opinion on this stuff). does anyone have any ideas on a possible new system that could work for the people

2006-09-22 00:31:22 · 20 answers · asked by wedgewoo 1

Take a good look at him. He looks like a Stooge, lol.

2006-09-22 00:03:47 · 3 answers · asked by smokindoggy 2

I have been looking at the following websites and they look pretty convincing so far. What do others think?

http://www.seeloosechange.com

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/110906Jones.htm

http://www.st911.org

http://hawaii.indymedia.org/news/2006/09/6298.php

2006-09-21 23:27:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 23:25:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was look at some of the links at this website:

http://hawaii.indymedia.org/news/2006/09/6298.php

and the evidence for a controlled demolition job look pretty convincing!

eg. Take a look at:

http://www.seeloosechange.com

What do you think?

2006-09-21 23:23:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 21:53:45 · 6 answers · asked by Sachin the great 1

It would seem democracies take a few election before everything falls into place.
Did america have any proplems at the start and when do you think Iraq, Afghanistan,East temor and any other new democracies will settle down a bit

2006-09-21 21:21:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

based on current events in our world,

2006-09-21 20:14:26 · 29 answers · asked by jessica w 1

they seem to hate us. we should end all aid to eygpt and other countries. if they dont appriciate it then **** em, right?

2006-09-21 18:48:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 18:44:36 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 18:30:51 · 3 answers · asked by brianj1946 1

i am a resident in the US and i was a former policeman in my country ( egypt ) for 13 years ranked as a captain .. the question is .. i wanna work for the FBI, CIA , NSA , or any thing in that area ... do u know any ways i can contact or find a job there ??

2006-09-21 18:15:30 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 17:44:35 · 2 answers · asked by Andi Muin G 1

The difference would be that about 17% of the voters or legislature would have to change its mind in order to change the law; not just 1%.

Another effect would be fewer laws. Those that got passed would be better laws, of which people were more sure (i.e. two-thirds sure, and not just "barely half" sure).

Really think about it.
Most people's knee-jerk reaction is: "Everything will get repealed because it will only take a third!"
Well, no, it would still take a half to repeal, just like it takes now. That's the first thing I said.

(That means that in order to amend it, it would take 2/3 to pass the new version. They would already have the 1/2 necessary to repeal the old version, and could make it part of the same bill in order to be sure the new one would actually get passed).

You would have less total laws to remember, and you would be 17% more likely to agree with them. The way it is now is neither better nor as good.
So why not?

2006-09-21 17:25:20 · 2 answers · asked by A Box of Signs 4

2006-09-21 17:14:36 · 11 answers · asked by Michelle T 1

2006-09-21 17:07:48 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 16:58:36 · 9 answers · asked by Michelle T 1

2006-09-21 16:56:08 · 5 answers · asked by Ned B 1

Passports aren't cheap nor hassle free to obtain.

2006-09-21 16:45:03 · 9 answers · asked by cork 7

Personally, I think he is a horrible leader and person. I disliked him from day 1. According to the most recent approval rating though, there are still 40% of Americans who actual like him. Why?

2006-09-21 16:31:12 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please, if you don't know, give your best guess.

First person who knows or guesses correctly, gets the points.

The correct answer can be found in the following newly released video documentary. It contains new never before seen video footage and inside details surrounding the tragedy. It's called:

9/11 Mysteries (Full Lengh. High Quality)

This is a brand new public domain 9/11 Truth documentary about the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center complex. It’s excellent. Pass this link on!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

2006-09-21 16:24:23 · 19 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5

I find it so interesting that President Clinton was actually impeached after getting blown by Lewinsky. The Impeachment was a success BUT, the overall process was a FAILURE because he wasn't convicted of anything and even KENNETH STAR (prosecutor) claimed the whole fiasco was a WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY.

However, considering how Bush lied to America about the reasons for the Iraq War, trumphed up charges against Saddam Hussein to justify going to war and is PRO TORTURE - just like Saddam (Bush is a hypocrite) - WHY HAS BUSH NOT YET BEEN IMPEACHED?

I'm guessing its because President Clinton was President when both the house of representatives and the congress were majority REPBLICAN while Bush enjoys a house and Congress filled with other fat, greedy Republicans - whose pockets he can keep filling with slush funds and back alley deals (i.e. HALIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN, etc)

There are NO CHECKS AND BALANCES right now so whatever Bush pusheds forwards goes no matter how stupid.

2006-09-21 16:08:40 · 17 answers · asked by ? 1

(bear with me) if Bush were charged with treason, could Cheney issue a pardon before he left office?

2006-09-21 15:41:04 · 10 answers · asked by The Gadfly 5

What are your opinions on the fact that the US foot the bill for a large portion of the construction of the UN building, we sacrificed our land for the footprint, we pay over 20% of the annual overall budget (how many countries are members of the UN?), and the building lately is used to conspire against the United States of America?

If you do not live and pay taxes in the U.S., please answer to some other forum question.

I truly believe in free speeech. But, having people that have not been allies of the U.S. since before I was born building a platform of anti U.S. mentality on our own soil seems to me like opening the chicken house door for the fox. Free speech in the United States applies TAX PAYING U.S. citizens here legally, and who are not here to undermine us.

Non U.S. , non tax paying citizens do NOT reserve the right to OUR free speech, and thusly, are subject to the same criticism they so eagerly serve up to us.

2006-09-21 15:38:52 · 3 answers · asked by detecting_it 3

They used it during the civil war.

2006-09-21 15:36:34 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, Ashcroft, then Gonzales have pretty much cleared the way for him to do whatever he wants, due to being a war-time president, and the fact that this "war against terrorism" is 'different' (never mind the fact that he started it in the first place) just seems to expand his powers even more.

I wonder just how far those powers can reach, and is it possible that if he so wished, he could extend the number of terms a presiednt is allowed to remain in office from two to.....however many he wants?

2006-09-21 15:31:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm an American, and none of my teachers know who the prime minister of Canada is?
Can some one help me?

2006-09-21 15:13:12 · 9 answers · asked by Jacques 5