Please, if you don't know, give your best guess.
First person who knows or guesses correctly, gets the points.
The correct answer can be found in the following newly released video documentary. It contains new never before seen video footage and inside details surrounding the tragedy. It's called:
9/11 Mysteries (Full Lengh. High Quality)
This is a brand new public domain 9/11 Truth documentary about the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center complex. It’s excellent. Pass this link on!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
2006-09-21
16:24:23
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Joe_Pardy
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
"Lokota Bob" Interesting answer.
2006-09-21
16:35:31 ·
update #1
"fr_chuck" That is also a very interesting hypothesis; but why demolish building 7, had it fallen into enemy hands?
2006-09-21
16:42:37 ·
update #2
"futurenavyseal2010" "Loose Change" was good, but it's been around for several months now. This video has only been around for a few days.
2006-09-21
16:47:25 ·
update #3
"jimbo" That's impossible to prove, but it shows creativity.
2006-09-21
16:52:06 ·
update #4
"Lee J" Pres. Bush did not give us much of a choice, some of us can not take his word for it. He has shown, he can not be trusted.
2006-09-21
16:56:01 ·
update #5
"clemsongoat" Explosions were seen and heard all over the building. Metal was melted, something jet fuel can't do. Thermite was found in the solidified molten metal. Myth ?
2006-09-21
17:02:34 ·
update #6
"To Be" So why have we not heard from witnesses, that talk about those events ? I see you have the same video.
2006-09-21
17:08:46 ·
update #7
"life loom" Don't smoke, don't drink, and don't fear "The Reaper".
2006-09-21
17:13:38 ·
update #8
"wardancer" I would much rather believe a video, taken from an "ant", than to take a "monkey's" word for it.
2006-09-21
17:18:43 ·
update #9
"Steve J" Are there witnesses that support the claim that employees were being moved around from floor to floor, prior to 911 ?
2006-09-21
17:24:15 ·
update #10
"cna1970" Yes, it is hard to believe there are people evil enough to plan this, but they do exist. Follow the trail of the "Skull and Bones", starting from Hitler.
2006-09-21
17:37:16 ·
update #11
"Shawn S" To scared to question their leader, that sounds rough. It's all the same, people like that, wouldn't believe the truth, if it bit them.
2006-09-21
17:53:33 ·
update #12
"LeAnne" Do you have any evidence to support your truth, or did Bush forget to give you some: Did he used the old, "Come on baby, you can tust meee!"
2006-09-21
17:58:07 ·
update #13
"supermans-protege" Can anyone attest to these "internet upgrades", "powerdown", and "tenant shuffling" ?
2006-09-21
18:04:38 ·
update #14
"duncandesorderly" I am not trying to insult your inteligence. There really is video recordings of witnesses who saw supposed internet upgrades, a complete powerdown of both buildings including the security system, and tennant shuffling, followed by heavy construction noises and other traces; and all just weeks before 911.
Sorry about your drunken acquaintance. If I were them, I would put a rag over my face and make a video recording, telling what I saw, I would then find a way to publish it on YouTube, without it being traced back to me. That would teach those people not to go around destroying lives.
2006-09-24
22:09:27 ·
update #15
Witnesses do exist. From the numerous reports of explosions to reports of strange noises on vacant floors prior to 9/11. Witnesses attest to finding large amounts of dust when arriving at their offices. Prior to 9/11 during and prior to the "unprecedented power down" witnesses claim to have seen people carrying spools of wire and other equipment. thanks for asking this question and keep up the fight for truth.
2006-09-26 10:57:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by DAN REVERE 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The witnesses are fewer than a tiny percentage of those involved in various other secret projects..
They are sitting, either self satisfied, or worried, at the fact that their testimony won't be heard by you or me, unless we know them personally, and they're drunk, or ashamed enough to cough. What a horrible position to be in, if you're an honest person.
The whole population of the USA is not able to muster enough courage of conviction to make a difference, so far, but there are heroes risking ridicule, and life.
Really, are you so naive as to think a demolition explosive placer could get in touch with Fox CNN etc and get their story aired? Besides the operatives would have been screened to check they could do this, believing it was for the best, and then there's fifth amendment stuff, for someone to come forward and confess would show remarkable independent courage, something that would be screened out in early days of induction.
Also don't patronise by saying the "correct" answer can be found in whatever documentary, that doesn't know any better than I do. That supposition is arrogant, you're treating people's intelligence in the same way as those you presume to despise do.
However I haven't watched the video yet so I'm guilty of prejudice, I will watch it now. Still "the correct answer" jarrs, it sounds like neocon chat.
2006-09-24 11:35:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by duncandesorderly 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll have to watch it when i have more time :\
It was rigged with cordite too btw.
The would-be-witnesses were evacuated constantly out of the WTC for a "security procedure" starting about 2 weeks before 9/11 (sigh)
Oh, and by the way Chuck. Those planes would not have taken down the WTC. Do you know how many companies who have helped to construct the buildings have stated that it was built to resist any kind of condition, including explosions? Why do you think the buildings toppled from it's bottom infrastructure down to the ground when we all know full well that the airplanes hit near the upper portions of the WTC?
Also, why is it that most of the individuals the Bush Administration deemed as the hijackers, have made appearances on the Al-Jazeera Arab Network, questioning the U.S. govt for using their names?
2006-09-21 16:36:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There aren't any. They did all the rigging during "internet upgrades", "power-downs", and "tenant shuffling".
wake up people, WATCH THE BUILDINGS FALL!
do you really think two random plane crashes could make THREE buildings collapse in such a way that makes demolitions experts say "DAMN, THAT WAS SOME GOOD WORK!"
?????
WAKE UP!!!!
oh yeah... the buildings in question were also the first and ONLY steel structured buildings to collapse via fire(that's the "official story" all you bushians so fervently defend -- in case you didn't know what you were defending)
THINK for yourself
ANALYZE the precious little evidence made available to us
ASK questions
DEMAND answers
2006-09-21 16:57:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by jeffe55106 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I watched the loose change video on Google. The Bushtians will never watch this Video because they may have to admit it makes sense, They may question what they have been preaching on here all along .
I tried to show my girlfriend , who is pro Bush, and she doesn't even want to hear one word from it.. I think this is the case of all the Bushtians... Too scared to sit through a documentary that questions the facts as stated by their God ..
If your a Bushtian then go and set the record straight.. watch the video and answer the questions within with logical answers.. I dare you .. If you got the guts to try and explain it away
2006-09-21 16:44:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shawn S 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
A brother of Bush has some position in the security company that wired the WTC. His cousin was the CEO of that company. There were numerous people who weren't able to work the weekend before 9-11 because the whole buildings were shut down for some work by this company. All of the power was out for the entire weekend. Anyway, it is clear to me, but if you can watch as much of this 1 1/2 hour video as you can. it is the best i have seen and put it all in perspective for me. There is no doubt anymore. http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=808
2006-09-21 16:33:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by To Be 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The WTC were not, the planes hit them, we know they did. not only did we see them, but many of us know people that were on those planes.
Building 7 is a different issue, it was a secure government bunker and had god only knows what in there. It is very possible it was rigged as a safety, in case it was overtaken and them blow latter that day because of the possible security risk.
And anyone trying to claim the planes did not hit, are merley denying the truth and doing a disgrace to those familes of people on the plane and need to tell them they are sorry for helpoing with the lies that the terrorist wants to spread.
2006-09-21 16:28:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hey, Joe, if you REALLY want to know the truth, here it is:
The World Trade Center skyscrapers weren't real buildings, they were just Hollywood props.
The planes that were clearly seen crashing into them were high tech, digital holograms.
The many families of the victims were all stand-ins from a local acting studio.
And the above TRUE account is every bit as valid as your's !!!!!
Better pull your hat down tighter so when your brain explodes, people won't think it was thermite.
2006-09-21 16:48:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
if I'm not mistaken there was a team of bomb sniffing dogs there on September 10,2001 on a random search which might of been done but I'm a not sure what to believe about 9/11 but i dont care who did it at this point.
2006-09-21 16:29:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by futurenavyseal2010 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the witnesses are in everyone's imagination...we were attacked plan and simple. Some people just crack me up. I am not a huge supporter of this President but.... there's noway anyone can convience me that he or anyone else killed that many people on purpose. There's got to be a better way to spend your time. Take all the time & money people spend on "9/11 cover up crap" and you could help people who suffered a loss that day instead.
2006-09-21 16:38:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by cna1970 2
·
0⤊
3⤋