English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

I would NOT!

2006-09-01 03:21:38 · 43 answers · asked by Rawr! 1

We know that financially, the money is put towards the candidate from the parts with the highest probability of winning. What can we do to get multiple candidates per party? Limit campaign finance so they can afford more? What's your solution. (Think of how different things would have been if we had been able to choose between McCain AND Bush years ago instead of having either or.)

2006-09-01 03:15:17 · 9 answers · asked by Chris P 2

DUH!!!!! I mean come on ladies the men have been running this show for SSSSSSSSSOOOOOOOOO LONG!!!!!

Look at female leaders like Wu Zhao, the only female empress in China, the amazons, the feirce woman fighters that scared the crap out of any man, and so many other woman. These woman were ahead of their time. But look at us in the 21st century!!! We haven't even had a female leader of the United States!

"Remember the ladies," Abigal Adams said. Now is the time!!!!!

2006-09-01 03:00:44 · 28 answers · asked by Yoda 2

Why haven't we been warned about the secret Iranian missle bases located in the Cuban interior?Why haven't they published the satellite photography of the Taliban training facilities in the Cuban Hills?
Infiltraitors could easily use the Cuban coast to launch attacks on the Gulf Oil fields, and force a further oil crisis which would make the U.S. further dependent on Middle Eastern and Socialist Nicaraguan oil.Where is the fleet?How can the Coast Guard hope to stand against a fleet of suicide boats?
The combination of the threat of missle strikes and oil field destruction could paralyse our ability to react, especially if it's timed to coincide with the North Korean assault on Japan and the Alaskan Pipelines.Are we safe?

2006-09-01 02:49:15 · 11 answers · asked by foxspearman 4

i dont think we hv full control over it .

2006-09-01 02:39:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 02:36:47 · 14 answers · asked by m_maghzi 1

Does everyone forget 9/11? I suppose that all who died on that day were just in the wrong place at the wrong time? If you listen to the baldwins of the world that is the impression you get. I mean I feel band for the familys that loose loved ones in the war on terror, should we just forget about the victims who perished in NY,Washington and PA? I would love to shut up the uninformed cindy sheens of the world. 9/11 forever in our hearts. I am sad to say that these "anti-war" anti Bush people are Americans. To all the critics of Bush (NBC) France is still accepting cowards.

2006-09-01 02:27:34 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Less than 10% of US citizens have passports, with even less than that amount ever having been out of the US, yet if Yahoo! Answers is anything to go by they are well informed about International Affairs. Are they really just pretending to know?

2006-09-01 02:19:04 · 8 answers · asked by Essex Ron 5

Recently there have been questions on Yahoo! about why everyone hates the President, why there has never been a woman or black President. etc. Yet ask a question about restricting the vote to those competent to use it and the same people get all protective about democracy. You can't have it both ways. I live in the UK, where only about 20% of the population voted Labour (the rest either voted for someone else whilst about 40% didn't vote at all), yet we have a Labour Government which, it seems, the vast majority of the British people detest. I suspect the same situation exists in the US. It begs the question - is democracy all it is cracked up to be?

2006-09-01 02:16:17 · 22 answers · asked by Essex Ron 5

Someone told me that the government has stepped in, is this true?

2006-09-01 02:08:49 · 16 answers · asked by Kara 3

Can a company force a union to accept terms of an unsigned contract, call it a contract and then pretend the union acceptd the terms by continuing to work for the company?

And what if the company forbids striking? Does the company have an unfair (or illegal) advantage?

2006-09-01 01:38:13 · 4 answers · asked by vector4tfc 4

can someone please help me with the information in the citation block 21? I cut and paste the info in there and now i cannot alter it, meaning cut and or paste it, it will not disappear. please help me with some info, thanks

2006-09-01 01:09:23 · 3 answers · asked by RICK 3

US government takes many decisions which are not liked by vast majority of US citizens. In a democratic country it is expected that government will not take decisions against will of the majority of its citizens? Why US government is not behaving in this manner?

2006-09-01 00:59:06 · 4 answers · asked by judicious 1

england is currently commiting billions to renew its nuclear power stations, to stop reliance on fossil fuels. It's also ploughing billions into its nuclear deterrant, which will either never be used or, if it is used, will probably just add 50 or so missiles to the thousands which would already be flying and so be a waste of time as the world will be over. ( i can't see england firing off unilaterally ). Yet it seems to think it has the right to deny iran the same right to advance its people by forcing it to use it oil supplies to generate power. Will it still deny them in forty years when their oil runs out ? I find it shameful. Together with our government's total support of israel using cluster bombs on civilians and destroying power stations and hospitals to free hostages, it can be little wonder the middle east sees the west with suspicion and contempt

2006-09-01 00:55:51 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 00:04:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers