Technically it's not just the Brits. There are the Yanks, Canadians, Polish and other nations that I can unfortunately not remember.
Russia is not the state that it was so I think the military capabilities are more advanced.
Eventually though what is needed is for Uncle Sam just to drop another "Little Boy" on the whole area! -problem solved!
2006-09-22 00:39:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by essex_serpent 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
someone had more beneficial positive initiate studying the heritage of warfare in Afghanistan. i ought to locate information going back to 1500 BC. This us of a has been at warfare continuously. Muslim armies went into India with the help of the Khyber pass back in advert one thousand and warfare persisted for hundreds of years. we've the first Afghan warfare with the British (1839-40 2). In January 1842, the Afghans slaughtered 16,000 British and Indian troops as they retreated with the help of the Khyber pass. Then there change into the 2d Afghan warfare (1878-seventy 9). In 1919, we've the third Afghan warfare. actually, there change into warfare adversarial to the British from 1930 to independence in August 1957. maximum individuals understand what surpassed off to the Russians. the 2d greatest superpower interior the international left with its tail between its legs. i ought to upload that the Afghans had an excellent variety of help from the folk. This us of a merely isn't conquered, and the warlords received't stand for foreigners telling them what to do. I don’t understand what the answer's, and that i do sense deeply sorry for the unfavourable Afghan human beings. yet I don’t imagine that the country is nicely worth one Canadian life. each and every thing will be because it really is 20, 30, 40, per chance 100 years from now. i'm no longer anti-militia and that i help our troops 100 in line with cent. We presented 4 more beneficial Canadian lifeless domicile the former day
2016-10-16 01:44:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was thinking the very same thing yesterday while watching the news. You also should add that the Russkys could do what they liked and did not have a PC crowd telling them not to shot anyone incase they were not really doing anything wrong they might just be holding that AK47 for someone else while they are in the toilet.
5700 men only a small fraction of this number are doing the fighting the rest are stackers and admin etc. Crazy govenment!
2006-09-21 23:30:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Russian army was poorly equiped and trained
The Taliban were sold weapons by the Uk and other EU countries
and trained by the British Army.
Strange how things change.
Modern weapons are all lot more efficient and many battles are now won without opposing troops ever seeing each other
2006-09-21 23:40:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
War isn't about defeating an enemy it is about enrolling new people into the fight, then slaughtering them for the sheer hell of it.
How the hell can war be justified, when all the World leaders go around smiling and shaking hands, while their people are ordered, by the very same people to murder one another.
The World, because of the advances in communications and weapon's technology is way too small to justify any War these days.
2006-09-22 01:05:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it still thinks it can run an empire (or perhaps as an extra in someone else's empire) and pretend it is doing it for the good of the people who want their country back.
2006-09-21 23:34:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nothing to say? 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Great Game
Nobody can invade Afghanistan. Why would anybody want to?
2006-09-21 23:44:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Perseus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry to tell you but Russia was never defeated..
2006-09-21 23:52:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by ramona 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ha ha may the best team win
2006-09-22 10:35:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God knows - they obviously never learnt from Vietnam
2006-09-21 23:28:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋