I'm trying to be creative while explaining why individual states want to hold the earliest primaries and caucuses (caucii?).
But I think I sound drunk. Tell me if I do:
New Hampshire residents are more likely to vote for candidates that represent their needs. Theoretically, candidates that fail to do so are likely to drop out. This gives New Hampshire an advantage, because only the candidates that support New Hampshire’s needs are available for the rest of the states to nominate. This is a survival of the fittest. For the sake of comparison, in the snowy Himalayas, furry tigers may be more likely to survive than balder tigers. If the bald tigers no longer exist (because the environment “voted” for the furry tigers’, leaving the bald tigers to die or “drop out of the race”), only the furry tigers can roam to other parts of the world. Eventually, the sole survivor, or the “winner”, will have to be a furry tiger, which the Himalayas voted for in the first place.
2007-11-26
14:19:27
·
11 answers
·
asked by
.
2
in
Politics