If the US were allowed to utilize more of her domestic energy resources, build more refineries, nuclear power plants. utilize coal to create gas, windfarms, oil platforms and alternative energy sources, would we be where we are today?
2007-11-26 14:03:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
SGT im not anti war in iraq and im surely not anti-military im a vet too-----just never been to iraq! Was just a rhetorical question. Maybe i shoulda phrased it differently!
2007-11-26 14:47:33 · update #1
No, we wouldn't be. How do I know? When you automatically protect the OIL FIELDS and ignore all the weapons and known nuclear sites, then NO, WE ARE NOT THERE TO PROTECT THE USA. WE ARE THERE FOR THE OIL.
People can either use their heads, or they can ignore the facts and swallow the kool aid.
2007-11-26 14:22:55 · answer #1 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For the ten millionth time, the war is NOT about oil. Quit listening to your Liberal, Bush-hating friends. They are poisoning your mind.
If this were a war about oil, gas would be 10 cents a gallon. Think about it!
2007-11-26 22:29:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The war is more about national security than anything else.
Get you opinions in order.
2007-11-26 22:11:31 · answer #3 · answered by Yuriy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
yes, we would. by the way, who is we and where are you? im guessing you are not part of the WE that are in IRAQ. i am part of the we that support the ones that are over there.
2007-11-26 22:12:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-11-26 22:08:09 · answer #5 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i think you've fogotten we are fighting a war on terror. Go take a cold shower so you can get your thoughts in order.
2007-11-26 22:08:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋