So what do you guys think?
I dont think it was
First off: they hanged him
and I think somewhere in the constitution it says that unfair and cruel punishment[example: death penalty, chopping someone's head off, hanging them] shouldn't happen if someone comitted a crime.
Second: Saddam ruling people in Iraq is Iraq's business not Bush's Bush is president of the USA not Iraq, etc.. Do you get what I mean?
Like if someone in austrailia was to take over the whole continent would Bush think about doing anything about it? No.
Third: They already captured him so why couldn't they let him suffer in jail?
Fourth: Bush is killing people through war, and Saddam killed to, so why not hang Bush?
***My opinion may not make any sense to you as I am only 13 years old but I would like to know what you guys think about this.
2006-12-31
05:22:48
·
15 answers
·
asked by
ijustwanttoknow
2
in
Politics