I read about Juanita Barrick, and her accusations on Clinton. She said she was raped, and too afraid to come forward. She appears to have been less intimidated by Clinton, 30 years later when he became leader of the free world, and decided to come forward with rape accusations. They were unfounded (and tons of money and resources were used trying to confrim these allegations). Is it OK to call Clinton a rapist? If so, will you be honest, and call him an 'alleged rapist'? Or are you still set on being the judge, jury and executioner?
2006-09-27
06:58:08
·
9 answers
·
asked by
hichefheidi
6
in
Politics