English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read about Juanita Barrick, and her accusations on Clinton. She said she was raped, and too afraid to come forward. She appears to have been less intimidated by Clinton, 30 years later when he became leader of the free world, and decided to come forward with rape accusations. They were unfounded (and tons of money and resources were used trying to confrim these allegations). Is it OK to call Clinton a rapist? If so, will you be honest, and call him an 'alleged rapist'? Or are you still set on being the judge, jury and executioner?

2006-09-27 06:58:08 · 9 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Okay, he's an "alleged rapist"

A confirmed liar, adulterer, opportunist & embarrassment to America.

2006-09-27 07:01:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

I say probable rapist. READ THE STORY AND LEARN. She is not the perfect witness, and no one is.

She was asked to sign a sworn statement and, unlike Clinton, she decided she could not lie. Find the NBC story. Many details were corroborated.

If this is your attitude towards sexual assault then I am glad you never had it happen to anyone you know.

PS I feel I have gotten "too heated" on this question. The facts available have been aired and we all can arrive at our own conslusions. This just hits close to home. Apologies. We agree to disgree.

2006-09-27 15:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 4 0

Clinton raped two women named Juanita?? what a coincidence!

2006-09-27 14:42:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Will you give the same leeway to catholic priests.There is little proof in rape anyway and the time this one occurred there was no DNA resource.It is the same today more often than not women do not want to come forward when they are raped because it traumatizes them and when they do come forward they face people like you.

I can give you more links about other women she was not alone.

2006-09-27 14:06:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 3 2

Given his moral code of conduct, lust for power and legendary temper...............yep--I believe her and the numerous others who have come forward. Monica was a willing participant, but it is still sexual harassment when the boss asks for sexual favors of a subordinate. Sorry, he is a pig who uses his 'position' to get off. If you're so sure he is innocent, why not join his staff and agree to be alone with him for more than five minutes?

2006-09-27 14:06:00 · answer #5 · answered by Cherie 6 · 5 2

Since there is no statute of limitations on rape anymore, I say let's LET A JUDGE AND JURY DECIDE!

Arrest him, read him his rights, and charge him.

He can get an attorney to spin for him, thanks. Why not let our criminal justice system work the way it's supposed to.

2006-09-27 14:03:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 5 1

Clinton is the only president in history to have a "bimbo squad" to pay off all the women he harrassed.

2006-09-27 14:01:18 · answer #7 · answered by Super Shiraz 3 · 8 2

Where there is smoke there is Fire!!
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
- FBI files misappropriated by the White House: c. 900
- Estimated number of witnesses quoted in FBI files misappropriated by the White House: 18,000
- Number of witnesses who developed medical problems at critical points in Clinton scandals investigation (Tucker, Hale, both McDougals, Lindsey): 5
- Problem areas listed in a memo by Clinton's own lawyer in preparation for the president's defense: 40
- Number of witnesses and critics of Clinton subjected to IRS audit: 45
- Number of names placed in a White House secret database without the knowledge of those named: c. 200,000
- Number of persons involved with Clinton who have been beaten up: 2
- Number of women involved with Clinton who claim to have been physically threatened (Sally Perdue, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp,
Elizabeth Ward Gracen): 5
- Number of men involved in the Clinton scandals who have been beaten up or claimed to have been intimidated: 10

2006-09-27 14:02:01 · answer #8 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 7 1

Calling Clinton a rapist when he has not been convicted of said crime in a court of law in front of a jury of his peers is un-American. That is a serious crime. Making sex jokes about the blue dress, is one thing; calling him a rapist is out of line. IMO

2006-09-27 14:07:40 · answer #9 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0 9

fedest.com, questions and answers