If we developed cars, home heating, and industrial power based on burning hydrogen, and some of that hydrogen was made from sources other than splitting water, then could we have a situation even worse than from carbon based burning.
With fossil fuel burning, we take carbon out of the ground and put it in the air, affecting the CO2 balance. But at least there is a giant biosphere working to split the CO2, but the carbon back in the earth, and put the oxygen back in the air.
With burning of hydrogen that didn't come from water (and there are cheaper sources of hydrogen than electrolysis of water), each new water molecule made is here to stay. There is no bio-cycle to break the water back.
Every passing day, the earth would be wetter, and the atmosphere would deplete in oxygen. Oh no! global wet asphyxiation.
2006-07-29
07:55:38
·
5 answers
·
asked by
enginerd
6