I am an undergrad student studying mechanical engineering, and have to write reports on a regularly.
I have come under allot of criticism concerning my sources of research. I am a hardcore fan of traditional, encyclopedias, but they do not stay up to speed with technology or current events, which is what most of my papers are on.
Recently by recommendation of one of my professors they advised www.wikipedia.org for information on current events/technology.
Since then I have come under scrutiny from a couple of other professors for using wikipedia as a source. They claimed "it is entirely subjective". But isn’t that the case with anything that is published? It is subjective to the writer? I still use wikipedia to do a considerable amount of research, but I never directly list them as a source. I personally don’t care for it, but I don’t get my paper handed back to me with comments about my research.
Any teachers out there have opinions on accepting wikipedia as a valid source?
2006-12-11
07:30:31
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous