I don't usually ask such snarky questions, but here goes:
In her official autobiography, Hillary says she was totally surprised when she found out her husband was having an extramarital affair. I dare say that she was the LAST person in America to be surprised at that. Is she that naive?
Much more importantly, with respect to the Iraq war, she does not say that her vote was wrong. She apparently is saying that she thought the president should have the authority to launch military action, but that she did not think he would use it as he did. But look at the news, and commentary, from the period - Bush was being called a warmonger and there was widespread criticism of his "rush to war." Is Hillary again the only person who didn't think Bush would attack Iraq?
So what's going on? Is she slow-witted, too trusting, naive, and therefore not the right person to lead and deal with foreign leaders and a dangerous world? Or is she just lying and spinning, showing insincerity?
2007-02-14
23:52:36
·
9 answers
·
asked by
American citizen and taxpayer
7
in
Politics