I believe that Bush was elected primarily because he claimed to be a born-again Christian. He therefore shored up the Republican nomination, as the far-right wing, conservative, fundamentalist Christians seem to control the Republican party. In addition, I feel because so much of the country claim to be Christian, and because so much of the country was tired of Clinton's lack of integrity, Bush was elected president....as an anti-Clinton, moral, born-again.
So, have we learned our lesson on what happens when we elect a politician based on his perceived religious.moral status, rather than on his intellect?
So, fundamentalists, in the next election, will you look past the candidates perceived religious status, and focus on his intellect, ideas, and ability to lead?
Would you vote for a candidate that shared all of your governing ideas, etc...even if he were say, an atheist?
2007-09-06
09:28:11
·
6 answers
·
asked by
G.C.
5