Atheists and evolution: doesn't it say something that all your so-called "missing links" fall short?

Question

LUCY: nearly all experts beleive was an unusual chimpanzee
HEIDELBERG MAN- built from a jaw bone that was conceded by many to be qutie human
NEBRASKA MAN- scientifically built from one tooth later found to be a tooth from an extinct pig
PILTDOWN MAN- jawbone from a modern ape
PEKING MAN- All evidence has disappeared!
NEANDERTHAL Man- Dr. AJE Cave said the skeleton ist hat of an old man with arthritis
NEW GUINEA MAN - dates back to 1970, species in north of AUstralia
CRO-MAGNON MAN- one of the earliest and best established fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's the difference?

That's every step of your evolutionary chain disporven! We end at modern man, a genius who thinks we came from a monkey.

Answer 1

You should get your information from a better source.

@>}----}-----

AD

Answer 2

There is little doubt about the existence of Neanderthals as a distinct species. While it's true that the first Neanderthal skeleton found had arthritis, numerous other Neanderthal skeletons and artifacts have since been found. Neanderthal culture and toolmaking are well documented. Neanderthal DNA is partially sequenced, enough to know that it is unlikely that any modern humans are decended from Neanderthals.

Answer 3

Why do you post this exact same question every week and never read the answers?

I will let others deal (again) with the lies and misrepresentations in your post, and instead give you the REAL human family tree, and we have quite a few specimens for many of them:

Ardipithecus ramidus

Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi

Paranthropus aethiopicus
Paranthropus boisei
Paranthropus robustus

Homo habilis
Homo rudolfensis
Homo ergaster
Homo erectus
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo sapiens

Now, would you care to comment on any of the actual ancestors, and not the nonsense from your creationist cut-and-paste source?

By the way - Lucy (australopithecus afarensis) was indeed an ape, and was indeed unusual. Two things to think about: we are also apes, and the unusual thing about "Lucy" was that she walked FULLY UPRIGHT with human-type hip and leg structure.

Answer 4

"NEANDERTHAL Man- Dr. AJE Cave said the skeleton ist hat of an old man with arthritis"

What about the other 399 skeletons that have been found, not to mention the DNA that has been extracted?

The rest of your so called evidence is just as flawed and not worth the time to refute.

Answer 5

Wow, just wow. First off, they are mapping the DNA for Neanderthals, and it isn't a human. Second, well, all of your points are actually lies.

Also, we didn't come from a monkey. We share a common ancestor to monkeys.

on second thought, I am pretty sure this is a joke. Or at least exhibit A as to what is wrong with our education system.

Answer 6

A neanderthal man with arthritis, to try to explain that Neanderthal's did not actually walk all stooped over.

It is still a neanderthal man... LOL

Someone has to learn how to read. There is no such thing as a missing link, what you are looking for does not exist in reality.

There are plenty of fossils that could be studied and observed. But your creationist propaganda literature does not want you to read about those.

Answer 7

Evolution can only be disproved, and therefore creationism can be proved, when the sequence of the fossils of living organisms can be shown to be random. For example, if it can be shown that a single mammal appeared BEFORE the first fishes appeared, that will be clearly the proof of DIVINE intervention! The same can be said for the age of various apes, hominids, and humans. Without evolution, biology itself would make very little sense. The internal organs and the complexity of the organisms attest that life clearly proceeded from simple to complex, and not otherwise.

Answer 8

Where are you getting all this from? It sounds suspiciously like that Dr. Dino guy. I want you to know that evolution is real. If you don't like the "missing link" evidence, that's okay. Here's an example of evolution: you have an appendix you don't need, and wisdom teeth you don't use. Ever wonder why? It's because, once upon a time, our ape ancestors needed them. Or did you think that in the process of 'intelligently' designing humans, God was a little careless? I know -- perhaps the appendix is the repository of the soul. Have you had your appendix removed? 'Cause if so...

Answer 9

There is no one evolutionary chain, welcome to the 21st century. Many of the species which were believed to have formed a "chain" of evolution lived at the same time as one another, refining the "chain" of human ancestry into something that looks more like a bush, with many dead ends.

Scientific theories change as new evidence is uncovered, unlike supernatural superstitions which cling to their traditions, no matter how outdated or contradictory to evidence.

Answer 10

Your list is very outdated and inaccurate. Example, there are thousands of Neanderthal fossils, that's thousands of individuals from all across Europe and Asia Minor. They all show the same features, gradually changing from Homo Erectus to Neander over hundreds of thousands of years.

Lucy, 'nearly all experts', which experts, what are their names, or are you just repeating a falsehood you heard from somebody that heard it from somebody that read it in a creationist book 30 years ago.

Better luck next time.

Answer 11

You're funny.

I think that the Houston Museum of Natural History wouldn't have Lucy on display if there was any controversy about what she is. And there are several other fossils from the same species including this 85% complete one: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060920-lucys-baby.html

Go look at the picture of that skull and compare it to a chimp skull and get back to me if you think they look much alike.