There are "proofs" of God's existance going back thousands of years. St. Thomas Aquinas' proofs being the most famous. However, none of the theological proofs have withstood the test of time. Philosophers, scientists, even lay people have refuted every single one of them. When asked and pressed on the matter the closest thing to a universal concenseus I've ever gotten is that faith is tied to feeling. People just "feel" that it is the right choice. However, human psychology is a tricky thing and relying on feeling without external evidence is even trickier. In fact, in areas other than faith, believing in something without evidence or in the face of negative evidence, is considered a psychosis. If religion is not a psychosis, how do your rationalize your beliefs? If beliefs don't have to be rationalized then how did you come to know they were true? Was it childhood indoctrination? Was it studying the scriptures and prayer? If the later, how is that different from just an "feeling"?
2007-05-17
07:07:19
·
12 answers
·
asked by
ericmedlock
1