If R&S were split into a Religion subsection and a Spiritual subsection, I know that the "religionists" wouldn't stay on their side, and the "spiritualists" wouldn't stay on their side, so I'm not suggesting or advocating that. And I know that you can be spiritual without being religious, and be religious and spiritual, but can you be religious and not spiritual? If you can't, what's the difference? Where's the dividing line between being religious but not spiritual? And are you spiritual if you have a set of beliefs, which include not being a part of a religion? If so, is that a religion in and of itself? I know some atheists and agnostics say they are spiritual but not religious, yet some atheists believe their atheism is a religion? Where's the line? When does being spiritual cross the line into a religion?
2007-03-21
09:21:08
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Tonya in TX - Duck
6