As noted several times in the Bible, people who lived hundreds of years did not have a first child until they were well past 100 years old.
Is it possible that, because they lived longer, on a hormone level, they matured slower, perhaps not entering puberty until decades later than is common today?
Consider that Christ, as a perfect human being, had everlasting (not immortal) life and would have lived forever, if not for catastrophic injury at age 33. There would be a physical trade off for such a long life span.
Had Adam not chosen a woman over God (yes, he was a fully mature male), his downline generations may not have had the ability to be attracted to women, and producing children at too young an age. Otherwise, they would have overwhelmed the ability of the planet to sustain such a population, after a very short period of time.
Christ may not have had that ability to be attracted to women (or anyone else for the gutter minds) until he was well past 100 years of age.
2007-01-16
12:28:10
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous