For those of you that don't know, irreducible complexity states that something as complex and fine tuned as a body organ (like an eye) can't be reduced in complexity (made simpler) or else it would be rendered useless (like removing a cog from a clock mechanism).
This of course is an argument against evolution, since evolutions states that living things gradually become more complex over time. Darwin however, dismissed this argument with a simple explanation. And you can easily observe a human becoming more complex inside the womb as he starts out from a single cell, simple -->complex.
But that's beside the point.
Since this argument says that simple things can't give way to more complex things, it implies that god would have to be more complex that the universe, meaning something of even greater complexity would have to create him, and so on.
2007-11-29
15:51:46
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality