Over and over on this forum we hear, "The Bible can not be trusted by reason of the fact that is was written by humans".
Ok, now, if this is the benchmark of what can and can not be trusted as reliable information, then how is it that those who use this perspective to dimiss the Bible, place any confidence at all in any human publication?
Whether it is medicine (say the doctrine blood saves lives)
biology, or a respected reference work, like the encyclopedias, of any other well respected human writing, why the double standard, that the Bible can not be trusted, BECAUSE it was written by men, yet the writings of man that disagree with the Bible can be trusted, BECAUSE they were written by men?
Is not this the same as what the Bible believers are often accused of? Picking and choosing?
Not trying to start any trouble, but doesn't this seem illogical?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070824140816AAKl0zW&r=w#R8MtXmC5BzfNOdE9slLlTbip4Q6Vjc4vCYc41vNFzWpDncoPA.uR
2007-08-24
10:33:12
·
30 answers
·
asked by
Tim 47
7
in
Religion & Spirituality