English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — James Ford Seale, a reputed Ku Klux Klansman, was sentenced Friday to three life terms in prison for his role in the 1964 abduction and murder of two black teenagers in southwest Mississippi.

Seale, 72, was convicted in June on federal charges of kidnapping and conspiracy in the deaths of Charles Moore and Henry Hezekiah Dee, two 19-year-olds who disappeared from Franklin County on May 2, 1964.

The young men's bodies were found two months later in the Mississippi River.

The prosecution's star witness against Seale was Charles Marcus Edwards, a confessed Klansman, who received immunity from prosecution for his admitted role in the abductions and his testimony.

As far as I'm concerned, they should have jailed that last klanner boy, Charles Marcus Edwards because he shouldn't have gotten off scott free just because he turned state's evidence. Why hasn't anyone destroyed the monkey's before now? Why were they left roaming the earth in their own waste?

2007-08-24 10:37:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

Check out the link:

http://www.courttv.com/news/2007/0824/seale_ap.html

Here's another:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/2007/08/24/2007-08-24_reputed_klansman_will_serve_3_life_terms-1.html

Look how ungodly, and how beastly, evil, and ugly he looks. He looks like that couey slob who murdered the little 10-year old in Florida. You see any resemblence there in their race?

2007-08-24 10:40:50 · update #1

http://www.wlbz2.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=69467

2007-08-24 10:41:08 · update #2

4 answers

Anytime I hear one of them klanner trash get the ax I am so thrilled. It just pisses me to death why it took them so long. Imagine how the families must have suffered unduly because of that white hatemongering scum. I just don't appreciate them and I cannot say that I ever truly have.

I'm glad you posted this question and links. It's good, LOL, to see the pigfaces in chains...hahahahaha! Get it??? HAhahahaha!!

2007-08-25 13:01:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"Do *you* agree that the taking of a human existence is homicide as defined above?" - particular, I believe the assertion. Why...properly a million. "homicide is seen noncriminal in numerous situations, including deaths via fact the effect of warfare and putting somebody to death via the valid sentence of a court." - here in warfare: a rustic is struggling with yet another from violent strikes. And in court - the community has suggested a man or woman should not be risk-free to be loose of their community to any extent further. 2. "Killing is additionally legally justified or excused, because it incredibly is in circumstances of self-protection or while somebody is killed via yet another man or woman who's attempting to ward off a violent legal." - it incredibly is the sturdy Samaritan tale with a twist. Saving somebody from harm. 3. "criminal homicide happens while a man or woman purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently motives the death of yet another. homicide and manslaughter are the two examples of criminal homicide." here a man or woman has desperate an person would not could desire to be alive to any extent further - and easily GOD can try this. Makes a plan or is purely too wasted from partying to renowned what they are doing - and in the two circumstances could desire to be shown they are in a position to't do what ever they choose in a community. The community dictates what's real or no longer - and incredibly talk those morms - which variety a peoples way of existence. i won't be in a position to tutor this yet each and every from time to time persons are purely born undesirable and could't be chuffed of their community and could under no circumstances substitute.

2016-11-13 08:24:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Regardless of the reasons and of your personal opinions, take a look at the link, below. It might have a few surprises for you (i.e., who the victims were, and about the sentencing, which was not "three life terms"; it was three, consecutive, 20-year terms (a score of years for each victim), which, certainly, for an old man, is as good as a death sentence, et al.).

2007-08-24 10:52:48 · answer #3 · answered by skaizun 6 · 0 1

angry because your not getting your reparations? don't knock my race and i won't knock yours.

2007-08-24 10:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by anti_sheeple 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers