I agree! It's like "Spanky and our Gang". One woman does research on the asker before answering, then big daddy pops up and tells them how to answer and when and if they need to be reported. It's hilarious! They say that 60 is 40 but they sure as heck hang on to that "Senior" title. LMAO!! And, big daddy's avatar, please, give me a break!!
2007-08-25 01:33:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by ndnquah 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I recommend that the top cut back for contributions be finished away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "supply away" software yet one that all of us make a contribution to love a discounts plan, and could be secure against different makes use of by the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so apprehensive approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it returned into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for his or her own activity, 2d pay returned each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet never paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the comparable for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they desire some thing extra they do it on their own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had never been incredibly replaced. They, a team of pupils, pronounced that each and every physique expenses of activity could be 3% or much less for each individual to alter into rich if needed (that must be real additionally to taces). the best financial concern could be, they reported, while there have been no expenses of activity. Why no longer attempt this answer? the rich could nonetheless be rich. My question is: while soial protection will become a topic related to federal expenses, why no longer artwork with a balanced or income funds and spend no extra advantageous than is provided in, as any kinfolk has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents as a fashion to get rules that serve the country? God bless usa.
2016-10-09 04:32:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They probably have some issues with pent-up rage, but are too chicken to just go ahead and be a misanthrope, so they hide behind an avatar and make the comments they've always longed to make, anonymously.
2007-08-24 10:30:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by fizzygurrl1980 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because they are lacking in self-respect, as well as, respect for their fellow human beings.
2007-08-24 20:36:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cranky 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's no way to know specific reasons, It is just there mentality for whatever reason.
2007-08-24 12:57:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by oldman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was always told that the dumbest question is the one that is never asked, go figure :))
2007-08-24 10:26:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mostly for the cheap thrills.
2007-08-24 10:25:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because that is where their mind is,they think it is funny.
2007-08-24 11:45:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some people are just that way.....
2007-08-24 10:25:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ms Common Cents 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Generally it's the immature teen and pre-teen.
2007-08-24 10:48:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋