I saw a comment by an athiest that based the proof of her answer on an article on the website www.evilbible.com. I did read a good deal of this article and then called my father. He has studied the Bible indepth and can explain in detail what each verse in the bible is actually saying. Many "points" that the person who wrote this article made, to try to dispute Jesus as the messiah, and other such disputes, my father was able to dispute every single one. The one that said that says that Jesus could not be the messiah because the messiah has to be a direct desendent of David, and that Joseph who is a direct desendent of David is not Jesus' natural father, therefore Jesus did not meet the requirements of the messiah. Well did the author know that Mary was a desendent of David as well? Guess he didn't study the Bible or understand it as well as he thought, huh? Anyone else think these Athiests "points" can easily be proven wrong by someone who has really studied the Bible?
2006-08-11
12:39:34
·
35 answers
·
asked by
LittleMermaid
5
in
Religion & Spirituality