That is, men should not have any rights regarding the fate of their children prior to birth? Do you believe in this only under certain circumstances, regardless of the circumstance, or under no circumstances?
If the father (and his family) were willing to raise the child regardless of whether the mother wanted to be a part of it, does he have the right to have his own child, or do you believe she should be able to deny him of his child and abort?
After all, biology is the reason she is pregnant rather than him, so should he be punished for being unable to have a baby? (and don't avoid the question by saying that men couldn't deal with it. If they were capable of pregnancy, then they could endure.)
Please answer under the terms that:
1. She was not raped, and it wasn't incestual. She consented.
2. There is no threat to her health/life should she have the baby.
If you do believe in it, do you think it goes against the ideal of gender equality? (explain)
2007-11-25
14:44:18
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Gum Drop Boy
2