(As with questions concerning "some feminists", please note that "some" is different from "all" or "most" or "many".)
Some masculists defend a view of masculinity as the "strong, silent type", as primal, even primitive, uncomplicated, simple, not "over-analyzing", not "thinking too much", and even suggest that when men discuss feelings, they're being "feminized".
While they are entitled to their views on masculinity, I then have to wonder when they also make a show of celebrating how many men have been great philosophers, poets, and other thinkers
Did these men not analyze things? Did they not think things through over and over from many angles? Did they not express emotions? Were they the "strong, silent type"?
Does it make sense for masculists to celebrate the achievements of men who, on their own terms, aren't really much "men" at all?
2007-11-02
06:33:50
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Gnu Diddy!
5