English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-02 00:39:51 · 8 answers · asked by ByTheWay 4 in Social Science Gender Studies

kate lomax, you have blocked me from seeing and answering your questions. Let me humbly point out that only a low life will open a one way channel and offer a diatribe of opinions to somebody kept on block and ignore.

2007-11-02 05:41:28 · update #1

8 answers

Feminism wouldn't last 2 minutes in nature.

In nature... natural ability & inclination is rewarded... not legislated against.

EDIT:

(bruce)

"Murder" happens every second in nature if you think about it... & animals have have their own ways of dealing with "crimes" against other animals. Disease happens everywhere.

Feminism has no place there.

When survival is on the line, crippling males & propping up females so that a false semblance of "fairness" emerges would surely kill them off.

...Just like what's happening to our society/families/marriage. (speaking of cancers)

2007-11-02 02:11:35 · answer #1 · answered by hopscotch 5 · 4 2

In nature the female selects her mate based on characteristics that support the idea that he is the best, most capable mate, the one that will provide the greatest chance of survival for her offspring. Ever watch the videos of male animals fighting for the opportunity to mate?

If they male loses, and doesn't get to mate, they are, in effect, neutered. Wouldn't you say?

2007-11-02 17:47:37 · answer #2 · answered by jt 4 · 0 0

Actually, in the canine world, male dogs are neutered as soon as it is safe for them - usually 6 months. They never have the experience of mating.

2007-11-02 10:04:38 · answer #3 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 0 1

In only a few days of checking in on this catagory of "answers" I've noticed a few men constantly confusing the laws of nature that are in place because animals don't have the power to think, just to exist, with the principals of thought processes used by humans.
There is no possible way to compare the instinct of unthinking animals to the necessary thought processes and results of humans.
hopschotch, if the ability of humans to think does not seperate us from animals, then certainly the fact that men are the only species to know of a higher way of living and choosing not to, does.

2007-11-02 10:22:40 · answer #4 · answered by paigespirate 4 · 1 2

So, we are examining the canine world as a comparison to feminism.
I have now read it all on this forum.
Interesting.

2007-11-02 11:45:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Some one tell me where this question comes from?

Hopscotch: Rape, infancide, murder and cancer occur naturally in animals in "nature". I wouldn't be using nature to back up your arguments

What is, should not always be ought.

2007-11-02 09:08:51 · answer #6 · answered by bob 3 · 1 1

That's nice, but faulty hypothesis. But, IF pigs had wings, bet they'd fly.

2007-11-02 11:45:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Only if we didn't invent contraceptives for dogs.

2007-11-02 09:03:46 · answer #8 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers