English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 19 July 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

I still haven't seen proof. I've checked around, but I still haven't seen any media showing Soldiers being booed, jeered, or spat upon when coming back from their tours or, unfortunately, lost their lives for this country by those who disagree with the war. I continue to see rhetoric.

Go ahead with the insults as well, it only shows I'm right...

2007-07-19 12:24:49 · 10 answers · asked by linus_van_pelt_4968 5

2007-07-19 12:18:23 · 44 answers · asked by JamesR 2

AKA: the John Doe Provision.

"Congressional Democrats today failed to include a provision in homeland security legislation that would protect the public from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior that may lead to a terrorist attack, according to House Republican leaders.
“This is a slap in the face of good citizens who do their patriotic duty and come forward, and it caves in to radical Islamists,” said Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee.

On March 27, the House approved the "John Doe" amendment on a 304-121 vote

2007-07-19 12:15:46 · 14 answers · asked by CaptainObvious 7

both are responsible for countless wars, torture, murder, and a lot of other forms of human misery

so which poison is worse than the other?

I would say catholics...the supressors of science and the protectors of child molesters

2007-07-19 12:15:11 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

FDR and LBJ are the only two Candidates since the Civil War (Andrew Jackson in 1828) who have received 51% or more of the vote for President of the United States.

(Republicans have had twelve - George HW Bush, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, Dwight Eisenhower, Hurbert Hoover, Calvin Coolidge, Warren Harding, William Taft, Theodore Roosevelt, William McKinnley, Ulysses Grant, Abraham Lincoln)

2007-07-19 12:14:20 · 14 answers · asked by ? 2

He is destroying our resources, our army, our reputation and just about everything else this country stands for. Hes done 100x more damage than any "godless, america hating, communist, liberal" has ever done.
He should be hung for treason.

REPUBLICANS--stop trying to impose your beleifs and values upon everyone else..ITS GETTING ANNOYING.

2007-07-19 12:08:32 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 12:03:25 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

WASHINGTON (AP) - "Former CIA operative Valerie Plame lost a lawsuit Thursday that demanded money from Bush administration officials whom she blamed for leaking her agency identity.

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds and said he would not express an opinion on the constitutional arguments.

Bates dismissed the case against all defendants: Cheney, White House political adviser Karl Rove, former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage."

Thoughts? We know that outting a non-covert CIA agent breaks no law. Why try to sue?

2007-07-19 12:03:05 · 8 answers · asked by Jeremy A 3

Other than put on a big show and bring in beds so they can sleep on the job, other than the lowest approval rating in history, other than trying to let all the law breaking wet backs go free, what have they done? Their whole motive is to rase all the heck they can. It has been said that even bad attention is better than no attention at all.

2007-07-19 12:01:22 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Everyone knows that his drug of choice is cocaine....Shame on you, Comedy Central

2007-07-19 11:55:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not looking for the general answer. I'm looking for why Bob, Carol, Laronda, Amanda, Steve, Taylor, and whomever doesn't do it. For me on most issues; It just doesn't hit my wallet hard enough.

2007-07-19 11:45:35 · 15 answers · asked by splatman32 1

With all the craziness in the world going on, do you think we'll turn enough national attention towards their genocide?

2007-07-19 11:44:08 · 16 answers · asked by Sanman 2

http://youtube.com/watch?v=mlNW1yTpgss

2007-07-19 11:44:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since Bush will not tattle on himself that he was Commander in Chief of the leak, it's best that the case ends now.

2007-07-19 11:41:00 · 20 answers · asked by Lou B 4

des·pot (dspt)

NOUN:

A ruler with absolute power.
A person who wields power oppressively; a tyrant.

2007-07-19 11:40:14 · 13 answers · asked by El Duderino 4

Democrats Aid Radical Islamists, Trial Lawyers

News item: "Democrats are trying to pull a provision from a homeland security bill that will protect the public from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior that may lead to a terrorist attack..." This bill was proposed by Peter King, and it was in the aftermath of the flying imams, those six of them that got on an airplane in Minneapolis and started behaving in a manner similar to what was reported on the flights on 9/11. So some passengers and flight crew reported 'em, and the imams threatened to sue the airline and the passengers and all that. So they introduced this legislation that would protect the public from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior. But the government itself is telling us to do this. "Be vigilant out there! Keep an eye out! Keep a sharp eye out for suspicious behavior!" Now, the Democrats are trying to take this out. "This legislation moves to a House and Senate conference committee this afternoon and will implement final recommendations from the 9/11 Commission, and Peter King said, 'Democrats are trying to find any technical excuse to keep immunity out of the language of the bill to protect citizens who, in good faith, report suspicious activity to the cops or law enforcement. It's a slap in the face of good citizens who do their patriotic duty and come forward and it caves in to radical Islamists.'" It does! What in the world is the benefit to the Democrats of this? The trial lawyers! All right. "How dare you try to limit lawsuits?" is the answer to the question, ladies and gentlemen. The trial lawyers. This is a potential goldmine out there waiting to be raked in. I'm glad you asked.

http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070719/WEEKEND01/70719001/1001

2007-07-19 11:34:17 · 9 answers · asked by GREAT_AMERICAN 1

Because of a national emergency?

2007-07-19 11:33:51 · 16 answers · asked by El Duderino 4

They are against Barack Obama's idea to fund programs that teach children the difference between appropriate contact with adults and inappropriate contact. Since children are easily confused, this would certainly help them defend themselves. And he's not saying it's mandatory, a parent does not have to place their kid in any program like this at their school. It's a matter of choice. He simply believes these programs are healthy and deserve funding.

What is the Republicans' problem with that? Or is this just another lame attack from an irrelevant party whose ship is sinking?

2007-07-19 11:33:23 · 15 answers · asked by Incognito 5

Or is it someone else, a despot like Hitler, Franco, Mao, or Chavez?

2007-07-19 11:32:34 · 11 answers · asked by nom de paix 4

We have sold arms to every nation that we may have to go to war with in the future .
We have armed one regime that wipes out its own people only to go back later and arm the other side to promote a constant need for military hardware around the globe .

I am sick of this and you all should be too .

It was bad enough when China and Russia armed one side and us the other and we let our troops get killed for money in the past .

Today we know the score .

Bush flat out lied to the people to get a war going in the Middle east .

He pushed the patriot act over 1000 pages of law that creates a police state and even includes payoffs to chemical companies and sets aside aide to be used in other nations to battle so called terrorists . Columbia is loaded with terrorists and will be receiving even more guns money and military support .

Are you sick and tired of how this nation arms every side and sticks our people in the middle ??????




"?"



"?"




I am .

2007-07-19 11:23:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is anyone else outraged by this? What the hell is she doing? I dont understand why she's agreeing to hold a fundraiser for him. Honestly to me is looks like black people standing up for other blacks regardless of their policies and thats not right. Ive always respected Oprah but lately shes become a joke. Can someone explain to me what they think the consequences, either positive or negative, will come from this publicity stunt?

2007-07-19 11:20:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

What are our Soldiers dying for?

2007-07-19 11:19:41 · 8 answers · asked by El Duderino 4

intimated he won't pardon Campeon and Ramos. He says prosecutor Johnny Sutton is a dear friend of his from Texas who is fair and the border patrol agenst were convicted by a jury of their peers after listening to the facts, given by an illegal drug smuggler after receiving immunity. Hmmm. Here's the story and remember, vote republican so we can keep the evil libs out of office.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070719/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush;_ylt=AgPByNTNAyonBnWLzvPGtuhp24cA

2007-07-19 11:18:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Though Bates said the case raised "important questions relating to the propriety of actions undertaken by our highest government officials," he said there was no legal basis for the suit.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070719/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak_lawsuit_13

2007-07-19 11:09:57 · 6 answers · asked by ? 6

Democrats or republicans?

How can we give these people a stepping stone to nurture a better future to buy a more secure home?

2007-07-19 11:09:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 11:01:36 · 9 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7

or are they too tied to extreemist to try soething like that?

2007-07-19 10:56:44 · 21 answers · asked by Casey D 2

The Stocks Market is at its all time high.

so is it still Bush's fault?

2007-07-19 10:53:21 · 19 answers · asked by Samm 6

Is anyone else sick of the fact that people keep saying democrats hate this country. Then they would not be running for office, there trying to change this nation for the better.

And i am a proud democrat who would die to protect the law and the values this country was founded upon.

2007-07-19 10:45:02 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers