Politics - 6 October 2006

Name one single war that we fought that there wasn't any opposition to it. Yet we've won most every war. In World War 2, there were plenty of people opposed to it, but that opposition didn't bother our brave soldiers in the slightest. In WW2, we had a clear plan for victory, and our brave soldiers secured the victory; they didn't care that some people opposed the war.

Why shoud we believe that suddenly our soldiers can't fight effectively unless every solitary soul back in the USA supports the war. Our soldiers are NOT a bunch of softies. They are great American heroes and should not be hung out in Iraq for endless years of combat in a pointless, politically driven, and counterproductive war.

2006-10-06 12:34:37 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.nysun.com/article/41020?access=649942

2006-10-06 12:30:51 · 19 answers · asked by Will 6

2006-10-06 12:26:45 · 20 answers · asked by me 5

The conservatives say that our soldiers' psyches are so fragile that if they hear that not everyone is loving Georgie's war back home, that their morale will plummet and they won't be able to fight well anymore. They even say that the reason we haven't won Bush's war yet is because the soldiers' morale is down because they have heard there is some opposition to the war. I don't accept that.

Do you really think our soldiers are so mentally soft??? I don't. Our brave men and women are a lot tougher than that. What do you think??

2006-10-06 12:22:13 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-06 12:21:32 · 6 answers · asked by me 5

... there was another American Revolution and Marxists overthrew the US government and it became the the People's Republic of America and the new Communist/Marxist party made the Democrats / Republicans illegal and everything became like the USSR (in regards to work, system of government, state control)

What would you do/feel about it?

!!!ALSO!!! how would this affect the rest of the world? Positively or negatively or what?

I know this is really far-fetched but i was just wondering since America was heavily anti-communist for a period of time.

2006-10-06 12:20:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

their nuclear program? LMAO crooks leading crooks?


BTW watch the news and learn something

2006-10-06 12:18:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are we footing the bill for all of of Bush's fund-raising junkets. Nothing would make me happier to know that we're paying so Bush can fly all the country raising money so pro-war Republicans can buy elections so that he has enough votes to keep our soldiers dying in Iraq for years to come.

It kind of gives you warm fuzzies, doesn't it.

2006-10-06 12:13:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

sick of bush, our congress and the US gov is full of scum who refuse to address problems, opting instead to bend rules and make nice so they dont lose their jobs.....they are destroying this nation........

how is canada better?

2006-10-06 12:13:14 · 18 answers · asked by bush deathgrip 2

I don't mean what do you think of liberals. I mean what does the word actually mean, what position does it describe?

2006-10-06 12:11:18 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

sex scandels, oil for food, unenforced resolutions Time for the UN to go and NOW

2006-10-06 12:07:06 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

like abortion and flag burning why do they cut and run Are they embarassed of their own party?

2006-10-06 12:04:17 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is for both men(if it was possible to get pregnant for them) and women. Please don't give me a long reponse on facts.

2006-10-06 12:02:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

then why aren't the thing jacks straws going on about be banned too? there are notices not to wear hoods or helmets on post office doors ... i'm confused

2006-10-06 11:59:16 · 8 answers · asked by postmaster2000uk 2

The UN and the world community, especially the rich nations of the US and UK, refused to stop the genocide in Rwanda, and now there is a chance for the world to save hundreds of thousands of lives in Sudan, but will we take action? Is the UN being rendered useless by the nations more interested in oil than lives? There is only one question here though; will the 21st century be one of
humanity or inhumanity?

2006-10-06 11:57:31 · 8 answers · asked by frostyboylive 1

2006-10-06 11:56:01 · 24 answers · asked by postmaster2000uk 2

2006-10-06 11:51:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Who has been holding onto these sexually explicit IMs for three years? If the Democrats really cared about children, this information should have been brought out immediately. But they wait 5 weeks before an election. This is an October suprise that will backfire of the Dems.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert said an hour after he learned of the IMs, Foley was gone. He took immediate action.
Now remember the e-mails that Hastert knew about were not sexually explicit. They were just chit chat and Foley was warned about that. But these IMs were sexually explicit and Hastert acted immediately when he learned of them. There are people in the Democrat party that are putting children at risk for political gain.

2006-10-06 11:49:20 · 14 answers · asked by babe 2

Do you think that international politics today has turned more money-orientated and economic power and away from ideology or not.
Which is more important to you?

2006-10-06 11:46:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

e.g.
the aral sea has shrunk by 40% since 1960.

lake chad is just 10% the size it was in 1970
why is this?

2006-10-06 11:41:49 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

why do left-wing talk radio shows require donations from listeners, while right-wing shows are fully funded by the station? is it because left-wing talk radio shows are so disagreeable that they have to pay the station to stay on air? for example air america, funded by george soros. right-wing shows dont need funding from people or groups, seems there are stations that are ready to pay them to stay on air.

2006-10-06 11:39:48 · 14 answers · asked by kunta kinte 2

have the numbers decreased in the past few years

2006-10-06 11:38:28 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here is what I think. Abortion is not right in my opinion and it has nothing to do with Religion. It is plain wrong, though sometimes it is justifiable speacially at times of rape and incest. In general I think abortion is wrong because no one has a way of predicting what kind of person the child will be. On the other hand criminals on death row already have shown what kind of persons they are and have committed hidieous crimes.

That's my opinion, what do you think and what is your opinion? And yes I would be what you consider a Liberal.

2006-10-06 11:34:59 · 34 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

Personally, I would donate it to the Red Cross.

2006-10-06 11:33:52 · 8 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5

SOME Republicans on here seem to happy the deficit will only be 250 billion dollars!

Pardon me, we have a 8 trillion dollar national debt.....and some people are happy the deficit will be 250 billion? Rediculous. We have way too much debt to celebrate.

The deficit needs to be ZERO! And the national debt needs to be paid down.

2006-10-06 11:32:57 · 12 answers · asked by Villain 6

voters are clearly disgusted. removing money out of the political process is the only solution. if we can blow $500 billion in iraq, we can certainly afford to finance elections using gov money giving equal expose to all parties......i know the politicians would fight it,,,,,,here's the kicker, they work for us, vote em out if they dont support it.

2006-10-06 11:30:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

bush.(america) Mushraf(Pakistan) Manmohan singh (India)

2006-10-06 11:23:20 · 4 answers · asked by Ali S 1

I don't remember who said it but it was something along the lines of if every black baby would be aborted, the crime rate would go down. How much truth does that statement hold?

2006-10-06 11:22:25 · 11 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

2006-10-06 11:21:20 · 13 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5

2006-10-06 11:17:49 · 6 answers · asked by me 5