Do we, the American taxpayer, pay for Bush to fly all over the USA to raise funds for Republican candidates?

Question

Are we footing the bill for all of of Bush's fund-raising junkets. Nothing would make me happier to know that we're paying so Bush can fly all the country raising money so pro-war Republicans can buy elections so that he has enough votes to keep our soldiers dying in Iraq for years to come.

It kind of gives you warm fuzzies, doesn't it.

Answer 1

Yes, of course it is part of his BUDGET, haven't you heard of the old saying "IT TAKES YOUR MONEY TO MAKE MONEY"and besides, if he can take 300 billion dollars and give it away well, whats a few dollars to fly around the country and ask for more.

Answer 2

Yes.

If President Bush goes to any state to raise funds for the Republican Party or a specific candidate, the law states that the Republican Party must repay the Government the cost of a first class plane ticket for President Bush and any staff who is apart of the fund raising itself. However, if the President makes so much as a 5 minute speech about the economy or the War in Iraq for "Government issues" seperate from the fund raising than the trip is seen as for the Government and the fund raiser was simply a side stop that didn't cost any money. Hence the Republican Party owes nothing to the Government, even though it costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to make a trip like that.

Answer 3

just curious since this is abut the 7th question Ive seen against republicans by you so far.....do you know your history? Do you know even the present? But as far as answering this question, do you realize we are still....and willcontinue tofoot the bills for every past president? So Jimmy carter and Bill Clinton's travel and security are also being paid by us....somaybe you should investigate prior to whining endlessly on all these subjects

Answer 4

jointly as i in my opinion have not any further difficulty with that than say spending my tax money on Paxil or the different anti depressant which isn't used for existence threatening scientific care, which BTW I particularly have a difficulty with the government investment any of those issues. I do appreciate the main remarkable of others who do no longer desire to make a contribution in any thank you to a minimum of a few thing which they discover repulsive or against their ethical principals or religious ideals. i've got faith that for the period of the u . s . we are those with particular man or woman ideals and rights which could be very stable. Our ideals shouldn't enable us to dedicate crimes, in spite of the undeniable fact that the ideals of others shouldn't enable them to get the government to extort money from persons to pay for some thing it is against their concept gadget. this isn't any longer the governments activity to impose an action on somebody to do some thing to ascertain that the needs of somebody else to be fulfilled. IN different words, the tax payer is being compelled to pay a share of his financial nicely worth or earnings so as that the governmnet can fund some thing that the tax payer is against. How does that variety from say stealing oil from the middle East (if that's what some desire to declare those wars are approximately) and then using it if the persons in the middle East believed we've been polluting the planet with it? it may be theft (or extortion) for a reason which the sufferer of the crime of theft and extortion opposed. on the different hand while some thing is paid for the seller makes a determination as to it is greater significant to the seller on the time. the attainable ethical conflict it motives the seller or the financial earnings the seller could desire. there is not any selection in taxation it is compelled, hence the persons being taken from could insurrection in the event that they arrive to have faith to numerous what's being taken from them is being spent on issues which they're against and that they experience has no earnings to them. And who's to declare who's appropriate in retaining their ideals? this is the u . s . we are allowed to have our own ideals as long as we don't break rules. Getting the governmnet to extort money with the intention to enforce some thing it is against the taxed persons ideals and is likewise no longer a threat to nationwide protection, is criminal. it is termed theft.

Answer 5

I think we do but for some reason I had the impression that when he runs, his campaign has to reimburse the gov for at least a portion of the costs.

Answer 6

Sure it's politics genius..

we'd all be better off if us regualr folks stopped taking shots at each other and started watching all levels of government...

Answer 7

Yes. President Clinton did this as well, as has every other president in modern times.

Answer 8

you can't be comparing republicans and democrats when it comes to taxes , if taxes are paying the bill it is an investment because when republicans win taxes will stay low

Answer 9

YOU KNOW DAMNED WELL WE ARE PAYING FOR THE CROOKS TO RAISE MONEY TO BEAT THE HONEST PEOPLE IN NOVEMBER. WHAT A BUNCH OF CROOKED CHRISTAN RIGHT MORAL PEOPLE IN THE CONSERATIVE PARTY

Answer 10

congress has the best health care and tax services.......explains why they are so out of touch doesnt it?