Politics - 3 October 2006

2006-10-03 23:28:07 · 8 answers · asked by cockysnel 1

2006-10-03 23:25:52 · 17 answers · asked by Christopher C 2

The world cup finals take place every four years and - apart from a handful of idiots who are dealt with by local police and ostricised by everyone else - everybody gets on with each other and enjoys the event.

In recent years Iran and America have played games which have not involved anybody being shot or bombed, African nations have equal standing with first world countries and the Germans have got the hang of humerous songs.

Politicians have utterly failed to achieve this sense of worldwide community, resoting to air strikes, trade sanctions and general violence to try and settle their differences.

So why not send out football teams to play a match over political issues? Civillians will be entertained, rather than have their legs blown off by landmines and the chances of America being the winners are somewhat slim!

A case in point - the current world champions are Italy, who despite being a Catholic country, manage not to bomb Islamic countries on a regular basis!

2006-10-03 23:23:25 · 17 answers · asked by lickintonight 4

2006-10-03 23:17:44 · 5 answers · asked by priyankji 4

2006-10-03 23:14:36 · 5 answers · asked by happinezz 2

2006-10-03 22:40:55 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-03 22:39:07 · 5 answers · asked by Goldfish" 1

2006-10-03 22:34:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Members of the Security Council have the right to veto as we allknow. When te US proposed the Iraq War, France vetoed meaning that the US can no got through with it. When a ceasfire was proposed to the Lebanon war, the US veted and everyone listened. The US has absolutely no right to do that. Did I mention that it has not paid its dues to the UN in maybe ten years...No Comment...

2006-10-03 22:28:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

didnt you learn about lying condi, yer just diggin that hole deeper and deeper

2006-10-03 22:25:25 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

.

By resigning instead of being ejected or placed on trial by the US House, OR by acting before having criminal charges brought against him, Foley was able to "grandfather" his Congressional retirement program (credits).

This means that he can even be convicted of a federal felony and sent to prison and STILL draw his benefits (ALL AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE) just as a number of other former Congressmen are doing while beating on their cell-bars and wearing orange jumpsuits.

NOW THAT YOU ARE INFORMED TO THE //REAL// REASON THAT FOLEY RESIGNED, do you think any differently about him??

.

2006-10-03 22:20:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Explain one of the main differences of opinion the delegates had, and how The Great Compromise sorted it out.

2006-10-03 22:17:20 · 1 answers · asked by o a 2

What is Bush afraid of? I think this was one way for the Bush administration to resolve some issues. Bush's refusal to take up this debate indicates hidden agendas. Could this be a prelude to him attacking another country illegally and create more hevens for terrorists. It seems the universal law does not apply to the Bush administration.

2006-10-03 22:17:05 · 11 answers · asked by kalule 2

2006-10-03 22:14:00 · 4 answers · asked by jess 1

2006-10-03 21:34:21 · 12 answers · asked by me 5

2006-10-03 21:23:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, how can half the population be under the standard deviation? Doesn't make sense, other than the correspondence bias, also known as "fundamental attribution error". Is there any other cause?

2006-10-03 21:03:29 · 4 answers · asked by me 5

i think no

2006-10-03 21:01:27 · 8 answers · asked by mjallebawalsah21 1

religion or petrol

2006-10-03 20:59:23 · 5 answers · asked by mjallebawalsah21 1

Because of this, why aren't other options explored. Controlled demolition is the obvious answer to the collapse so why is the hypothesis not tested. Are you against this hypothesis being tested. If so, Why?

2006-10-03 20:57:55 · 7 answers · asked by Luke F 3

IT CAN

2006-10-03 20:56:52 · 5 answers · asked by mjallebawalsah21 1

2006-10-03 20:44:56 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

in just 20 minutes i got the answers i wanted.
now i know for sure the majority do not like bush.
so we are sure the repunks will not win the nov elections.

2006-10-03 20:41:01 · 8 answers · asked by andar_ka_bandar 2

2006-10-03 20:33:33 · 6 answers · asked by me 5

Even with hindsight we can tell while Rumsfeld was involved it would fail.

2006-10-03 20:32:21 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

only give politcal view

2006-10-03 20:19:07 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-03 20:14:37 · 12 answers · asked by me 5

2006-10-03 20:10:24 · 9 answers · asked by me 5

Democrat Deval L. Patrick holds a commanding lead over Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey in the race for governor, even though a majority of voters oppose his positions on immigration, income taxes, and crime, a new Boston Globe/CBS4 poll indicates

Fifty-five percent of voters surveyed supported Patrick, while Healey, the Republican nominee, was backed by 30 percent.

If I were a Republican, I'd start clearing out my desk. Right?

2006-10-03 20:00:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have been off work the last few days with a virus/flu type illness. As I only had part time hours and have no sick pay entitlement, this is financially very bad for me.
I understand I might need some kind of sick note, but by the time Im well enough to see a doctor surely he wont be able to give me one since nothing can be proved?

2006-10-03 19:57:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous