What is Bush afraid of? I think this was one way for the Bush administration to resolve some issues. Bush's refusal to take up this debate indicates hidden agendas. Could this be a prelude to him attacking another country illegally and create more hevens for terrorists. It seems the universal law does not apply to the Bush administration.
2006-10-03 22:17:05 · 11 answers · asked by kalule 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is unable to think on his feet.
2006-10-04 00:47:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a dilemma which involves us all. At present the EU are behind proposals for negotiation, since the US and Iran do not share diplomatic relations. The rejection of these proposals will almost certainly lead to a UN Security Council resolution, which will involve even more countries.
The US and Iran should be talking secretly, and probably are, but no government wants to set a precedent of being brought to the public table with a gun against their head.
There are mechanisms for discussion which can very constructively involve Russia, Turkey and other countries in the region without it being a mere two nation conference.
This is what Bush is trying to avoid because it would be doomed to breakdown and would possibly give Iran and its current leader more international status than warranted.
2006-10-03 22:31:57 · answer #2 · answered by Bart S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It amazes me how people can turn on Bush and take the edge of a madman. no rely what you think of of Bush, you won't be able to take the edge of a rhetoric speaking Isalm extremist. Rumsfled made a good element approximately appeasment, in spite of if the invasion of Iraq replaced into incorrect, in spite of if I do nonetheless think of that they had WMD's someplace this is a brilliant u . s ., those all of us is enthusiasts who choose you to stay Islam, or die. they won't be appeased. i think of the persons who're so Bush hating could somewhat study how those extremists govern their people. The terrorists are all linked by using those Islam regimes. If no longer firectly, they a minimum of supply ethical help. Did any Islamic countries come out and denounce 9/11? the college hostage taking in Russia? The Madrid practice bombing, London, Bali, it is going on and on. Islam is basically an excuse for means, bear in mind that.
2016-10-18 11:18:55 · answer #3 · answered by wach 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush refused as he knows he is not good at debates which require a quick thought process, besides the Iranina prez. is better educated and dressed
2006-10-04 00:36:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because there's nothing to debate. Nejad is in CLEAR violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Most of the countries in the UN agree. What is there to debate? The UN is right, Nejad is wrong. Period.
2006-10-03 22:22:16 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How can Bush debate with a certifiable lunatic who wants to destroy Israel, and then the world?
2006-10-03 23:04:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We do not currently have diplomats in Iran. That would have to be first step. Can't put cart before the horse.
2006-10-03 22:21:16 · answer #7 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the antichrist
2006-10-03 22:22:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Don't be too hard on poor Dubya; he has ONLY SO MANY WORDS in his feeble little brain and I do think he's used them all up for this year!
2006-10-03 22:22:01 · answer #9 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
so he wont lose and be humilated and then have an alaby to blow up iran as he did with iraq and everyother arab nation
2006-10-03 22:24:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋