Democrats are endangering children?

Question

Who has been holding onto these sexually explicit IMs for three years? If the Democrats really cared about children, this information should have been brought out immediately. But they wait 5 weeks before an election. This is an October suprise that will backfire of the Dems.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert said an hour after he learned of the IMs, Foley was gone. He took immediate action.
Now remember the e-mails that Hastert knew about were not sexually explicit. They were just chit chat and Foley was warned about that. But these IMs were sexually explicit and Hastert acted immediately when he learned of them. There are people in the Democrat party that are putting children at risk for political gain.

Answer 1

It was Demoncrats who fought for Homosexual Scout Leaders to have access to vulnerable and impressionable boys, yet when in the Governments Page Program it is proven just what a Homosexual is capable of they turn the tables and blame the GOP.

Answer 2

Exactly! If they are so concerned for the safety of the pages then why didn't they speak up when they first heard about this? Politics, that's why. They don't care about the pages, they don't care about children, they don't care about their Peanut Gallery full of blind liberal homos & harpies. They say Hastert knew what Foley was doing, but I'd like to know exactly what he was told, and when. Personally, I think the Democrats have been pulling the strings on this whole affair from the beginning, manipulating Foley's targets like puppets, telling them how to respond to the posts and what to say, and keeping records of every communication, releasing just enough information to Hastert so they can claim the Republicans 'knew' about Foley's actions but withholding the really juicy stuff until now - and screaming as if Hastert knew every detail of Foley's actions all along, trying to make this whole stupid thing look like it's the Republican's fault.

And Foley didn't really DO anything; he just sent dirty emails; he didn't have sex with any of the pages either voluntary or involuntary. Clinton had sex in the Oval Office, sexually assaulted several women, and lied under oath to Congress - and the Democrats still worship him like he's the Messiah returned. Foley sends out a few nasty emails to boys and the Democrats want the entire Republican party to step down? Right. How many little girls have been murdered in their schools over the last couple of weeks? Six? Seven? Plus that school principal? And what do the Democrats do? "Oh bother ... have somebody investigate that annoying distraction to make it look like we're doing something about it, and stop interrupting us while we're focusing on the IMPORTANT issue of the REPUBLICAN SEX SCANDAL!" Shows where their priorities are. Can the Democrats possibly sink any lower? I think not.

Answer 3

What is wrong with some people??? A republican is caught sending sexually explicit e-mails to a minor, while this republican was part of a commission that was creating legislation to protect children from sexual predators (what an Irony) and some people find a way to to twist it and blame the democrats, Now this some people write "House speaker Dennis Hastert said an hour after he learned of the IMs, Foley was gone" , So we are supposed to believe Mr Hast er and dismiss the parents that made the accusation, the IMs said something like " Do you get horny when you talk to me?" Isn't that sexually explicit for you? If I didn't know better I'd think you are part of an operation for damaged control but I know you are just a jackass that can't see what is in front of its eyes and believe that in this page we are a bunch of stupids ignorants, man... you are up for a surprise

Answer 4

primary Republican spin. Foley replaced into the perv who replaced into sending the messages, Republicans enabled him. it truly is who endangered little ones. it truly is worse than blaming the Democrats for balloting for Bush's conflict. you think of there replaced right into a demo plot to sit down down on Foley's IMs then think of it quite is a wild conspiracy concept that Bush planned 911. (certainly it quite is a wild conspiracy concept yet your concept is basically as undesirable)

Answer 5

Whomever held on to those emails and IM messages for any length of time should be prosecuted no matter who they were. Hopefully we will find out soon and some action against them will start.

Answer 6

Hastert did not take action.

Foley resigned on his own as soon as the story hit the media.

Answer 7

So now its the democrats fault? People like you yell at democrats when they call lowered gas prices a ploy by republicans but you do the same thing back with this????

Leave it alone. Just shut up. Please. I don't care what party he's for he's a worse person no matter when he did this.

Stop being so biased and thinking your side is always right and anything bad is the democrat's fault.

Answer 8

Seriously...please.. Hasert knew about it a year ago. He did not act when he knew about it in 2005. Republican aides from foleys office told Hasserts office way back when. The only response from Hassert is "no comment"

Republicans and their greedy culture of corruption are finished. The adults get to drive again in 2007.

Answer 9

FYI the democrats did not realease this information the FBI did and they did because the Republicans did not do as thay said and just brushed it under the rug in good old Republican style and then the FBI wanted to know why nothing had been done! and no he didn't act as soon as he heard about them the FBI gave him 3 months to fix the problem! try to find facts before repeating what anti liberal talk radio spouts off .. don't you know they are payed to lie? well now you do!

Answer 10

So why are the Republicans trying to spin this any way they can? It's all political games, don't blame just the Democrats. Both parties are disgusting for trying to use this as a ploy to get votes. It seems that everyone's forgotten a crime was actually committed.