Other - Politics & Government - September 2006

2006-09-18 08:25:22 · 23 answers · asked by bombardier 1

2006-09-18 08:02:51 · 27 answers · asked by Dr Fill 3

2006-09-18 07:32:48 · 16 answers · asked by Medicsgirl 2

2006-09-18 07:32:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

How about a nice wholesome game of paintball?

2006-09-18 07:30:24 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-18 07:26:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you are not satisfied with the direction of national government realize that your state determines, through its elected representatives, what the national government can and cannot do. as of right now the Bush Admin has been given a virtual go ahead on everything because republicans out number dems in the house & senate. Does this threaten democracy? Or is this a representation of how most Americans feel?

2006-09-18 07:22:10 · 9 answers · asked by ragajungle 2

Just finished watching ENRON: The Smartest Guys in the Room and once again wtinessed how they wished California would break off from the U.S. and sink to the ocean. I happen to love California. One line from the documentary that was really awful was: "What is the difference between California and the Titanic?" The Titanic went down with electricity." Any thoughts?

2006-09-18 07:19:20 · 7 answers · asked by Clock Watcher 4

2006-09-18 07:18:33 · 15 answers · asked by Anchor Cranker 4

2006-09-18 07:14:34 · 9 answers · asked by position28 4

only a year ago this was worst case scenario, with the US targeting Hugo while building a case against Iran like fake info against Iraq now widely discredited

why are these two world leaders joining up? don't we have enough instability already or is this justice of chickens coming home to roost, people pushing back, the stuff that Colorado professor was talking about?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5354812.stm
http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/churchill.html

2006-09-18 07:11:20 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-18 07:04:55 · 5 answers · asked by position28 4

2006-09-18 07:04:25 · 10 answers · asked by position28 4

It seems that a pre-emptive murder against someone who said they were going to murder me would be justified. Now let me be clear the person did nothing but verbally say " i'm going to kill you " and then in response I actually did murder them.

It seems our government has this right and I just wanted to know if all US citizens enjoyed this right. You kill them before they have a chance to kill you.

2006-09-18 07:03:57 · 9 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6

2006-09-18 07:03:51 · 7 answers · asked by position28 4

American opinions on human rights issues reveal that Americans have a poor understanding of human rights philosophy (evident in substantial support for tortures and killings). How can Americans gain an understanding of human rights? How can adults be enlightened on human rights issues after they are no longer in the school system?

2006-09-18 06:57:08 · 7 answers · asked by voltaire 3

2006-09-18 06:55:30 · 4 answers · asked by Ms Murphy 1

Or are most people happy with a just leader?

2006-09-18 06:54:31 · 10 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

next runner ups for president. I see many people ready to vote for demicrat just because they hate bush. Is it fair to judge your next republican because of what happened? I will be voting for who ever i believe will take me forward. Thats why I didnt vote for kerry bush may suck but kerry never even had any ideas he just bashed bashed and bashed he was wishy washy

2006-09-18 06:53:34 · 11 answers · asked by Thomas A 1

Can a candidate for the presidency be a teacher of the voting population? Can he or she actually enlighten and change opinions on the way to office, or is it a matter of kissing up and telling the voters what they want to hear that is ALWAYS necessary?

2006-09-18 06:52:20 · 6 answers · asked by voltaire 3

2006-09-18 06:42:53 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will there ? Or will it not exist as a named country, but only as a part of something else, ie Europe ? I used to sing that song as a boy, and there was no doubt then that we would always be English and British. No vitriol please this is a genuine question. Anyone who cannot understand the question ,please do not bother to answer.

2006-09-18 06:42:52 · 20 answers · asked by Tracker 5

2006-09-18 06:30:49 · 2 answers · asked by Wanda M 1

2006-09-18 06:24:41 · 10 answers · asked by bexcy 1

the war on terror started with Osama bin Laden, and his pro-Islamic terrorists, the al-Qaeda, responsible for attacking the US on 9-11, because they wanted the West to stay out of the Middle East, as well as 1993 bombing of the WTC, 1995 truck bombing of Saudi National Guard, 1998, Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania,,, why can't the US capture the worlds #1 terrorist, and stop the war on terror?
we know where bin Laden is, why does George W. Bush not hold Pakistan accountable for protecting him, after all Bush did promise, that no distention would be made between terrorists and those who harbor them?
Bush says five years later that the US has to be invited to search inside Pakistan for the most wanted terrorist mastermind in the world,,, is this true, or just another Bush lie?
Osama is not in Iraq, he never was, why has Bush invaded and toppled Saddam, causing ,,, 200,000 US troops to get bogged down there,, while Osama has continued to train new Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists?

2006-09-18 06:22:51 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-18 06:08:13 · 6 answers · asked by Latoria T 1

after 9/11 ?

2006-09-18 06:01:05 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know this sounds conspiracy theory like...

2006-09-18 06:00:39 · 12 answers · asked by jasong25 3

religion was to commit violent acts?

2006-09-18 05:54:05 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-18 05:46:28 · 16 answers · asked by wlday2002 2