So our invasion was to pre-empt that move. If this is true, then our underlying ulterior motive for visiting death and destruction on thousands of innocents, not to mention their warm 'n fuzzy despotic dictator, was to postpone the inevitable collapse of the world's 'dollar-based' economy.
Now Iran has abandoned the dollar and is selling oil for Euros.
Based on the above reasoning, do you think this leads to the inevitable conclusion that an attack on, and invasion of, Iran is next on the neo-con's agenda?
Question part II: If by some miracle Ron Paul is elected potus, and our troops are brought back home from every theatre, will we be safer, or at greater risk?
.
2007-09-07
07:37:35
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous