English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Military - December 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Military

2006-12-23 02:55:58 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

LOOK IT UP!!

2006-12-23 02:39:35 · 12 answers · asked by mikeygonebad07 1

america...we all know very darn well that u.s.a should be bombed
for murdering innocent iraq people as well as other countries. natually all you idiots out there are all going to get on your rags at once and pounce on me like a fruitcake to fresh azz but keep it on your pants america. if we do get bombed again (and we will) it's because we deserve. u.s.a is corrupt, america. thee most corrupt. we make kim jong ill look like a puzzy compared to a retarded president and a vice president who nearly shot hmself in the face. you all should have voted me. i ain't even had sex yet plus i'm a amature mommas boy yet even i know better decions. and for the record U.F.Os do exist. you america... you either refuse to accept
it or your mind can't handle the fact that everything isn't normal. just 2-3 days ago i saw on t.v a blackhawk crash in a neighborehood in u.s.a and they wouldn't disclose what happened.
nobody heard the blackhawk 'cuz they kept it secret. voice your opinions!

2006-12-23 02:39:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-23 02:32:11 · 13 answers · asked by dhruvika p 1

Apparently the photograph of the wall in the pentagon had an 18 foot hole in it after the crash, which makes it way, way to small a hole for a 757 to make. The engine is above the main body and not on the wings like a 757 which explains why there was no damage done to the Pentagon's outside wall that huge rolls royce engines would most certainly have made because they are localed on the wings. the hole looked like this O and should have looked like this o O o WHY?

2006-12-23 02:27:43 · 11 answers · asked by lovefights 3

2006-12-23 01:54:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-23 01:39:01 · 42 answers · asked by bong_25 1

the linguists, medics, pilots
this is not just for Iraq

2006-12-23 01:07:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am sure Bush supporters will won't mond they support the War(maybe not enough to fight?)---maybe thousands of evangelicals will volunteer>>>????.....

2006-12-23 00:59:37 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-23 00:32:21 · 3 answers · asked by sso 2

I was discharged from the army after serving 4 years for medical reasons, I even tried to get back in but the recruiters denied me. What are some good volunteer services I could do? I was thinking about the Red Cross, or even the Peace Corps if thats even still around. Anything else?

2006-12-22 23:24:54 · 4 answers · asked by lvillejj 4

I've heard rumor that the GI Bill dosn't cover a culinary degree. That's about $45K down here in Houston. Is there a Pell Grant or Voc Rehab that would either replace if not assist in tuition (Plus other school related bills)

2006-12-22 23:06:09 · 7 answers · asked by in_no_sent_lianne_669 2

Do they get an honorable discharge just like an enlisted man, or something else?

2006-12-22 22:32:56 · 6 answers · asked by Greg 3

As far as i know Sadaam has nothing to do with Alqaeda, he just made his people suffered for alond time but Hillery Clinton has a different point of view!!
Hillery Clinton summarized Saddam's relationship with 9/11 best ..
In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock (((WHICH NO ANYONE FOUND OR WILL FIND BECAUSE NOTHING EXIST))), his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ((((SO BOTH PARTIES IRAQ AND IRAN WHICH ARE AGAINST EACH OTHER ARE SUPPORTING THE SAME ALQAEDA GROUP!! DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENCE)))). It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

2006-12-22 21:20:06 · 12 answers · asked by mo 1

Can it be true that UK Special Forces are actually training U.S special forces?

If so why?

Thank you

2006-12-22 21:18:09 · 3 answers · asked by Hello 3

I'm in the Army and I've often wondered why the Marines' Officer ranks are the same as ours even though the Marines fall under the Dept. of the Navy (why don't they just call a Marine Corps Colonel a Captain, etc.).

2006-12-22 21:02:28 · 8 answers · asked by really_curious 1

that statement that just rolled out of my brain begs the next question
what are societys problems
can questioning the question lead to peace in a group
i say not,greed and power overrule
am i asking the right questions
what is the desired goal
blah blah blah
to ask the "best "question is nautral

2006-12-22 20:51:44 · 7 answers · asked by high 1

I can't judge every man, and this statement should resound in the ears of those that have committed no crime, or believes in dignifying the armed forces of nations. It is the lowest means of service that any man can fall upon,enlisting to murder others in the name on nationalism, but forgetting the similarity and close history,resemblence of the species as a whole, "the Human species". To work at the direction of greedy governments who trive and depend to keep the population distracted in the maintaining of a war economy, thereby continually creating new ones at the expence of the similar and uniform civilians of every nation that seeks peace. As long as the military exists, there exists wars and feuds between men, though they might always exist, the military is a mass productive method in performing massacres. All civilians of ever nation are similar and they have no ill to each other, therefore there is no justification of state militaries attacking foreign civilians, it is a crime.

2006-12-22 20:36:20 · 13 answers · asked by Zidane 3

i need to create a 2000 word paper on this question any suggestions

2006-12-22 20:25:39 · 5 answers · asked by mick airborne 1

Check it out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEWg3GDqc5o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDjSuIC2tDU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI9yZsvo44s

2006-12-22 19:39:56 · 10 answers · asked by Knowledge Is Power! 1

the world knows what the nazi americans are up too, trying to control the worlds oil supply by force and oppression like in iraq,so is the new military build up in the gulf about looking after americas greed (intrest) or is it about trying to pressure iran to stop it's nuclear activites on its nuclear power stations.

2006-12-22 19:28:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-22 19:22:41 · 12 answers · asked by Zena H 1

The photo was taken at the Puckapunal Army Barracks of a Leopard Tank. I have been told that the photo was called "Leaping Leopards" and I am wanting to know if there is a copy of the photo that someone may know where I can see it. I am not sure, but have been told that the photo is in black and white and taken in the 1970's (approximately). I am hoping to find a copy before the 2nd January, 07. ALL HELP WILL BE APPRECIATED!

2006-12-22 18:26:47 · 3 answers · asked by weatherwitch 1

Sauli Niinistö, a director at the European Investment bank warns Finland that the world is facing a "shift in power", and that Finland should take necessary safety precautions.

According to Sauli, the Chinese can bring USA to its knees by ceasing to buy dollars, destroying the US economy in one strike. This is a part of a formal warning to the Finnish government to be wary of the future security situation in the world.

Is it so ironic that the US generous defence spending has placed the country under the overlordship of China, defeating the very purpose of that spending?

It is bad news for NATO countries, as this could mean the alliance offers little or no protection against the Asian giant. I predict that the development of the internal defence of the EU will accelerate in light of this.

How do you view the security situation in the light of the US debt to China? Is it as grave as good ol' Sauli (lost the presidential race) Niinistö would have it?

2006-12-22 18:14:11 · 9 answers · asked by dane 4

Since our national security is at stake and there may be people from hostile nations hopping over our borders, do you think that we should pull our troops in places where our being there makes no sense and brought home to protect Americans? Why is this so hard to figure out in Washington? Why have they not done this already?

2006-12-22 18:08:28 · 14 answers · asked by Marie 7

fedest.com, questions and answers